From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fr0ga-0006cQ-7B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:51:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5FMoLoV010694; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:50:21 GMT Received: from cicero1.cybercity.dk (cicero1.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.4]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5FMjcfF006806 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:45:38 GMT Received: from user2.cybercity.dk (user2.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.35]) by cicero1.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDDC63F7E7 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:45:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17]) by user2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F4128677F for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:45:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Bo =?iso-8859-1?q?=D8rsted_Andresen?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:46:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <448C6E41.1030500@herkild.dk> <358eca8f0606111310r673db732r27c4813ce83a133f@mail.gmail.com> <200606152155.43994.sp_rm_it@yahoo.it> In-Reply-To: <200606152155.43994.sp_rm_it@yahoo.it> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1711347.0CNDUniGGE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200606160046.16953.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> X-Archives-Salt: e47fefc1-3406-4560-b894-94d7cec9f836 X-Archives-Hash: 13f17bef4d8129d618e7254f5fde1d2c --nextPart1711347.0CNDUniGGE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 15 June 2006 21:55, Sergio Polini wrote: > I'm sure (I'ld like to be sure) that this change is documented > somewhere, but I can't find where. > I need documentation because I'm an advanced user of some packages > (f.i., tetex), but a naive user of other ones (f.i., xine). So I > can't understand why and how I should re-emerge xine because of: > > [ebuild =A0 R =A0 ] media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r5 =A0USE=3D"X ncurses nls > readline -aalib -curl* -libcaca -lirc -vdr -xinerama" 0 kB > > Any hints? Look at the first section at the GWN from the 16. of January [1]. Also this= =20 (autouse) has recently been added to the release notes of portage 2.1 [2] (they forgot until now). [1] http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060116-newsletter.xml [2] http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES?v= iew=3Dmarkup =2D-=20 Bo Andresen --nextPart1711347.0CNDUniGGE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEkeM48/kKEzmwNNoRAtC7AJ9KHtjl80PM6Fp2WTB46fEiJGwi6ACg2oYd clFEapGQQdHQ2XrfjctU3pI= =WdpU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1711347.0CNDUniGGE-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list