From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FqVls-0008Dp-Dh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:51:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5EDnMMw016803; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:49:22 GMT Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk (rutherford.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.142]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5EDfUd9026774 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:41:30 GMT Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=desiato.digimed.co.uk) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FqVcf-0006AC-VZ for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:41:30 +0000 Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E17314249B3 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:41:29 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:41:26 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] broken libraries but library-linking is consistent ;-) Message-ID: <20060614144126.1498c53a@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <41038.141.38.43.231.1150289519.squirrel@ulm114.server4you.de> References: <40823.141.38.43.231.1150285949.squirrel@ulm114.server4you.de> <200606141428.25027.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> <41038.141.38.43.231.1150289519.squirrel@ulm114.server4you.de> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.8.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_ekMgJ_TyDB=pgtN6XFZTXpU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.69.83.178] X-Archives-Salt: e9e53768-8f18-4faa-adc3-e53d36b78dfe X-Archives-Hash: a83cda42193cda5d800e9eb594c577cd --Sig_ekMgJ_TyDB=pgtN6XFZTXpU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:51:59 +0200 (CEST), Norman Rie=DF wrote: > But why wasn=B4t this deleted by a emerge --depclean world or the unmerge > in the update-process of that packages. Because the files' datestamps and/or checksums had changed since they were installed. Portage won't remove a file that has been changed since its emerge. The most likely cause is that you ran fix_libtool_files.sh. If you run the files through equery belongs, I expect you will find that no package owns them, so they can be safely removed. > Who knows what other garbage-files live on my system and someday try to > overrule my control and start to think for themselves. These files are owned by nothing and used by nothing. all they do is take up a small amount of disk space. They won't start to think for themselves unless you have skynet in your USE flags. --=20 Neil Bothwick Therapy is expensive, popping bubble wrap is cheap! You choose. --Sig_ekMgJ_TyDB=pgtN6XFZTXpU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEkBIJum4al0N1GQMRAqjEAKCWbJ553ku1rx7UhQ4Ppxel37ujWQCeKc4v QLgo5iYmnZ4ItnKASBwp3jA= =k7iU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_ekMgJ_TyDB=pgtN6XFZTXpU-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list