From: Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@comcast.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 22:10:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606072210.11564.mcbrides9@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FAEEIJPAOFEMBBLKPMJEOEEPGCAA.BYoung@NuCORETech.com>
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 21:50, Bob Young wrote:
> > On 6/7/06, Roy Wright <royw@cisco.com> wrote:
> > > You might want to read:
> > >
> > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=282474&highlight=
> > >
> > > which basically recommends:
> > >
> > > emerge -s
> > > emerge -s
> > > emerge -e
> > > emerge -e
> >
> > Ugh, this is completely pointless. A single "emerge -e world" is
> > sufficient.
>
> Depends on what you consider sufficient. Although what the page recommends
> was misquoted, it actually suggests:
>
> emerge -e system
> emerge -e system
> emerge -e world
> emerge -e world
>
> That's probably is a little bit excessive, but the reason for doing the two
> emerge -e systems is so that the new tool chain is built with the new tool
> chain. At the end of the first emerge -e system you may have a new
> compiler, but that new compiler was built with the old compiler. What you
> actually want is a gcc-4.1.1 that was built with gcc-4.1.1. You could
> emerge the compiler twice before doing the emerge -e system, but the the
> emerges that happen before glibc is rebuilt are linked against a glibc that
> was built with the old compiler. Same with the rest of the tool chain and
> libraries.
>
> That being said "emerge -e system" is probably overkill just for a new
> toolchain. Updating a subset of all possible toolchain related things and
> then following that by a single emerge -e world would probably be
> sufficient for most people. This page:
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-345229.html is about doing an install,
> but it shows how to update a subset of the entire tool chain. Note that the
> article does in the end, do a double emerge -e system, so the the value of
> updating a toolchain subset is questionable for the article's purposes.
>
> In short:
>
> emerge gcc-config glibc binutils libstdc++-v3 gcc
> emerge gcc-config glibc binutils libstdc++-v3 gcc
> emerge -e world
>
> To be clear, in order to make sure absolutely everything is updated and the
> libraries that are linked against are also updated prior to use, the two
> emerge -e system commands, are the definitive solution. For those who don't
> want to spend many extra hours of compile time, in order to gain a 0.5%
> increase in performance, the above is offered for consideration.
>
> Regards,
> Bob Young
Wow! I said the same thing a week or so ago and got the same rebuttal.
However, it's what I do none the less. And it works.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-12 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <ad4496950606070647s5a4bc702m8deeda7dbd590c4a@mail.gmail.com>
2006-06-07 13:53 ` [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1 Mohammed Hagag
2006-06-07 14:30 ` Peper
2006-06-07 14:35 ` Julien Cabillot
2006-06-07 14:45 ` Kristian Poul Herkild
2006-06-07 14:56 ` Neil Bothwick
2006-06-07 15:00 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-06-07 15:25 ` Conneries wearegeeks
2006-06-07 16:04 ` Roy Wright
2006-06-07 17:46 ` Mike Huber
2006-06-07 18:09 ` Daniel da Veiga
2006-06-07 19:27 ` Roy Wright
2006-06-07 19:55 ` Daniel da Veiga
2006-06-07 18:17 ` Evan Klitzke
2006-06-07 23:25 ` Richard Fish
2006-06-08 0:32 ` Evan Klitzke
2006-06-08 4:40 ` Richard Fish
2006-06-08 11:39 ` Mohammed Hagag
2006-06-08 1:50 ` Bob Young
2006-06-08 2:10 ` Jerry McBride [this message]
2006-06-12 21:35 ` Bob Young
2006-06-13 0:09 ` Richard Fish
2006-06-08 4:24 ` Richard Fish
2006-06-08 12:34 ` Bob Young
2006-06-08 13:31 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2006-06-08 14:00 ` Bob Young
2006-06-08 14:28 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-06-08 14:57 ` Bob Young
2006-06-08 15:27 ` Toby Cubitt
2006-06-08 18:05 ` Richard Fish
2006-06-09 11:50 ` Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2006-06-09 19:43 ` Richard Fish
2006-06-16 17:25 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2006-06-16 17:50 ` Bob Young
2006-06-16 17:17 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200606072210.11564.mcbrides9@comcast.net \
--to=mcbrides9@comcast.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox