public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 19:37:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200605271937.29778.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200605271101.04907.sgtphou@fire-eyes.org>

On Saturday 27 May 2006 17:01, fire-eyes wrote:
> On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:41, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > > True.  But why keep 3.4?
> >
> > because 3.5 has some bugs - and some people have less problems tolerate
> > this bugs than others.
>
> I must agree here. I have been using the 3.5 ebuilds since they entered the
> tree many months) on two systems.
>
> I still consider it buggy, and am quite surprised they have gone "stable"
> in gentoo.
>
> While they are not major issues, they are definately annoyances: One is
> that konqueror has an interestingly difficult time scrolling up and down
> pages if they have text boxes which are populated with text in them.
>
> Another is that kmail crashes. A *LOT*. A minimum of two times a day on me,
> I have seen as high as five.

kmail crashes me a lot because of this:
it tries to fetch mails from a defunc server (it is still in the prefs, 
because it will be back in some weeks - and I don't know the pw anymore). 
When I close kmail, while it waits for the timeouts: crash
Or it won't really stop (kmail and kio_pop3 still visible in ps aux), 
advantage, when I start kmail again, I don't have to type in the 
kwallet-pw ... 

Oh, and logout most of the times only works on the second try ...

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-27 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-27  4:04 [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5 Anthony E. Caudel
2006-05-27  4:40 ` Manuel McLure
2006-05-27  5:36 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-05-27  6:03   ` Anthony E. Caudel
2006-05-27 14:41     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-05-27 15:01       ` fire-eyes
2006-05-27 17:37         ` Hemmann, Volker Armin [this message]
2006-05-29 20:52           ` Daniel
2006-05-29 21:35             ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-05-27  6:15   ` Steven Susbauer
2006-05-27  6:06 ` Richard Fish
2006-05-27  6:41   ` Anthony E. Caudel
2006-05-27  7:56 ` Neil Bothwick
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-01 19:05 Rafael Fernández López
2005-12-01 11:12 Thiago Lüttig
2005-12-01 11:45 ` Dale
2005-12-01 12:06   ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-01 11:50 ` Mrugesh Karnik
2005-12-01 11:58   ` Thiago Lüttig
2005-12-01 13:11     ` Mrugesh Karnik
2005-12-01 13:29       ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-01 17:01         ` Mrugesh Karnik
2005-12-01 17:14           ` Kumar Golap
2005-12-01 17:44             ` Mrugesh Karnik
2005-12-02  0:31               ` Dale
2005-12-02  6:46                 ` Robert Crawford
2005-12-02  7:39                   ` Dale
2005-12-02  9:03                 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-02  9:17                   ` Dale
2005-12-02  9:39                     ` Dirk Heinrichs
2005-12-02 10:13                       ` Dale
2005-12-02  9:49                     ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-02 10:14                       ` Dale
2005-12-01 18:13             ` Petteri Räty
2005-12-01 13:41       ` Michael Kintzios
2005-12-01 17:21         ` Kevin Hanson
2005-12-01 11:58 ` Uwe Klosa
2005-12-01 12:24   ` Dale
2005-12-01 12:53     ` Uwe Klosa
2005-12-01 13:31     ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-01 14:13       ` Dale
2005-12-01 12:17 ` fire-eyes
2005-12-01 12:35 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2005-12-01 15:02 ` Martins Steinbergs
2005-12-02  8:01 ` Christian Panten
2005-12-02  8:25   ` Dale
2005-12-02 13:03     ` Nagatoro
2005-12-02 13:12       ` Dale
2005-12-02 13:35         ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2005-12-02 13:51         ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-02 14:11           ` Dale
2005-12-02 15:19             ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-03  0:25             ` Robert Crawford
2005-12-02 13:32 ` Uwe Klosa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200605271937.29778.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
    --to=volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox