From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 16:41:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200605271641.02207.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4477EBB9.5040907@gt.rr.com>
On Saturday 27 May 2006 08:03, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:04, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> >>I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
> >>it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
> >>but I think I will then have to recompile all non-kde but related apps,
> >>such a k3b, that were compiled against the old libraries. Right?
> >
> > em, why do you think you'll have to unmerge 3.4?
> > They can coexist very nicely.
>
> True. But why keep 3.4?
because 3.5 has some bugs - and some people have less problems tolerate this
bugs than others.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-27 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-27 4:04 [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5 Anthony E. Caudel
2006-05-27 4:40 ` Manuel McLure
2006-05-27 5:36 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-05-27 6:03 ` Anthony E. Caudel
2006-05-27 14:41 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin [this message]
2006-05-27 15:01 ` fire-eyes
2006-05-27 17:37 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-05-29 20:52 ` Daniel
2006-05-29 21:35 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-05-27 6:15 ` Steven Susbauer
2006-05-27 6:06 ` Richard Fish
2006-05-27 6:41 ` Anthony E. Caudel
2006-05-27 7:56 ` Neil Bothwick
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-01 19:05 Rafael Fernández López
2005-12-01 11:12 Thiago Lüttig
2005-12-01 11:45 ` Dale
2005-12-01 12:06 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-01 11:50 ` Mrugesh Karnik
2005-12-01 11:58 ` Thiago Lüttig
2005-12-01 13:11 ` Mrugesh Karnik
2005-12-01 13:29 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-01 17:01 ` Mrugesh Karnik
2005-12-01 17:14 ` Kumar Golap
2005-12-01 17:44 ` Mrugesh Karnik
2005-12-02 0:31 ` Dale
2005-12-02 6:46 ` Robert Crawford
2005-12-02 7:39 ` Dale
2005-12-02 9:03 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-02 9:17 ` Dale
2005-12-02 9:39 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2005-12-02 10:13 ` Dale
2005-12-02 9:49 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-02 10:14 ` Dale
2005-12-01 18:13 ` Petteri Räty
2005-12-01 13:41 ` Michael Kintzios
2005-12-01 17:21 ` Kevin Hanson
2005-12-01 11:58 ` Uwe Klosa
2005-12-01 12:24 ` Dale
2005-12-01 12:53 ` Uwe Klosa
2005-12-01 13:31 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-01 14:13 ` Dale
2005-12-01 12:17 ` fire-eyes
2005-12-01 12:35 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2005-12-01 15:02 ` Martins Steinbergs
2005-12-02 8:01 ` Christian Panten
2005-12-02 8:25 ` Dale
2005-12-02 13:03 ` Nagatoro
2005-12-02 13:12 ` Dale
2005-12-02 13:35 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2005-12-02 13:51 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-02 14:11 ` Dale
2005-12-02 15:19 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-03 0:25 ` Robert Crawford
2005-12-02 13:32 ` Uwe Klosa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200605271641.02207.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--to=volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox