From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FjmYs-0008Jw-Gk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 May 2006 00:21:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4R0KOD7004544; Sat, 27 May 2006 00:20:24 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4R0Fi72013392 for ; Sat, 27 May 2006 00:15:44 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EBB51F58F7 for ; Sat, 27 May 2006 02:15:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D021F58F5 for ; Sat, 27 May 2006 02:15:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 13793707 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 27 May 2006 02:15:44 +0200 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 02:15:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200605270025.53855.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <20060526234340.798d35f1@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20060526234340.798d35f1@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605270215.43530.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 77ca7e29-f514-4862-aeda-8fcfd052a478 X-Archives-Hash: 1f11b0e3e21fd1e0cb50832dc477fe21 On Saturday 27 May 2006 00:43, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 27 May 2006 00:25:53 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > but eix-sync is still longer than esync (8 to 5) ;) > > alias es="eix-sync" cuts it down to two, for anyone sad enough to care... > or you could run it from cron. > > BTW how many characters have you typed in your emails to make the point > that one program's name saves you 0.8s per day in typing time? ;-) a day? luckily I don't sync every day ... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list