From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FVOdW-0006k6-VI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 07:59:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k3H7wtUq017491; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 07:58:55 GMT Received: from explorer.cz (mail.explorer.cz [81.0.233.73]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3H7spXV025708 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 07:54:51 GMT Received: (qmail 7795 invoked by uid 64017); 17 Apr 2006 07:54:50 -0000 Received: from Petr.Kocmid@project-bhairava.org by mail by uid 64011 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (avgd: 7.0. spamassassin: 3.0.3. Clear:RC:0(88.101.187.9):SA:0(0.0/4.0):. Processed in 3.253511 secs); 17 Apr 2006 07:54:50 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.1?) (petr.kocmid@project-bhairava.org@88.101.187.9) by mail.explorer.cz with SMTP; 17 Apr 2006 07:54:47 -0000 From: Petr Kocmid To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Completness of AVR toolset in dev-embedded? Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:53:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604170953.45943.Petr.Kocmid@project-bhairava.org> X-Archives-Salt: 22fe3801-5a42-44a6-934e-64f2d140ef22 X-Archives-Hash: 3ff63fb4efeea096dfc0e21d0bd22109 I wander, what's the point of having (noncompilable) dev-embedded/avr-libc in portage when there is no avr-gcc nor avr-binutils? However, I found some overlay ebuilds for avr toolset at http://gentoo.zugaina.org/erazor-zone/dev-embedded.html.en going to try it. Petr -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list