* [gentoo-user] CPUFREQ and 2.6.16
@ 2006-04-03 22:18 Jerry McBride
2006-04-04 1:01 ` Jerry McBride
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jerry McBride @ 2006-04-03 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
I depend on cpufreq to help stretch out the battery life of my laptop and it
works quite well with 2.6.15.x kernels. However, upgrading to 2.6.16.x
renders cpufreq dead in the water.
The boot complaint is, the start up script says I need to configure the kernel
for cpufreq support even though it already is... Even trying to start cpufreq
from the command line fails...
Has anyone else seen this ? Does anyone know of a fix? The cpufreq website ate
sourceforge.net is pretty much orphaned and there's nothing at
bugs.gentoo.org either...
Any help would be appreicated.
Thank you, in advance. Jerry
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] CPUFREQ and 2.6.16
2006-04-03 22:18 [gentoo-user] CPUFREQ and 2.6.16 Jerry McBride
@ 2006-04-04 1:01 ` Jerry McBride
2006-04-04 1:16 ` JimD
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jerry McBride @ 2006-04-04 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Monday 03 April 2006 18:18, Jerry McBride wrote:
> I depend on cpufreq to help stretch out the battery life of my laptop and
> it works quite well with 2.6.15.x kernels. However, upgrading to 2.6.16.x
> renders cpufreq dead in the water.
>
> The boot complaint is, the start up script says I need to configure the
> kernel for cpufreq support even though it already is... Even trying to
> start cpufreq from the command line fails...
>
> Has anyone else seen this ? Does anyone know of a fix? The cpufreq website
> ate sourceforge.net is pretty much orphaned and there's nothing at
> bugs.gentoo.org either...
>
> Any help would be appreicated.
>
> Thank you, in advance. Jerry
A follow up to my own request... the mentioned problem is fixed in 2.6.17-rc1.
Hopefully it'll stay that way...
Jerry
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] CPUFREQ and 2.6.16
2006-04-04 1:01 ` Jerry McBride
@ 2006-04-04 1:16 ` JimD
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: JimD @ 2006-04-04 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 20:01:17 -0500
Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@comcast.net> wrote:
> A follow up to my own request... the mentioned problem is fixed in
> 2.6.17-rc1. Hopefully it'll stay that way...
>
> Jerry
Did you get to test 2.6.17 yet? I was having similar problems when I
tried 2.6.16 with my AMD64 cool-n-quite support. It was working fine
in 2.6.15 so I just downgraded the my kernel back to 2.6.15.
Jim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I'm a geek, but I don't get it. 36-24-36 = -24. What's the significance?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Florida, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-04 1:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-03 22:18 [gentoo-user] CPUFREQ and 2.6.16 Jerry McBride
2006-04-04 1:01 ` Jerry McBride
2006-04-04 1:16 ` JimD
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox