From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FQX0d-0004EI-8A for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 21:54:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k33LragK015760; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 21:53:36 GMT Received: from ms-smtp-4.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-04.texas.rr.com [24.93.47.43]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k33Llq1F009197 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 21:47:53 GMT Received: from crichton (cpe-24-167-115-63.satx.res.rr.com [24.167.115.63]) by ms-smtp-4.texas.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k33Llmro008638 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 16:47:49 -0500 (CDT) From: Peter Kelly To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] rc-status and broken links Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 15:47:48 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200603281923.49508.linuxpete@satx.rr.com> <200604021734.01284.linuxpete@satx.rr.com> <20060403102143.2d5096fd@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20060403102143.2d5096fd@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604031647.48544.linuxpete@satx.rr.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Archives-Salt: 0ef5e92d-d0a6-4452-98ef-ea477d6b798a X-Archives-Hash: 76f090018c901fd47f7982508515e868 On Monday 03 April 2006 04:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 16:34:01 -0600, Peter Kelly wrote: > > I only see the [broken] message when I use `rc-status -s`. > > If I just type 'rc-status', I get a correct response for the default > > runlevel. > > There's a bug files here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113755 > > I see the same now, I was thinking of rc-update (I'd automatically > corrected your typo :) but rc-status -s shows everything as broken, when > it isn't. On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:30:20 +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote: >On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 16:34:01 -0600, Peter Kelly wrote: > >> I only see the [broken] message when I use `rc-status -s`. >> If I just type 'rc-status', I get a correct response for the default >> runlevel. > >There's a bug files here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113755 > >I see the same now, I was thinking of rc-update (I'd automatically >corrected your typo :) but rc-status -s shows everything as broken, when >it isn't. Thanks. I've updated the bug, and added another with a reference, since I couldn't figure out how to re-open 113755. Now, will this post using Agent and Wine? If it double posts, I apologize. Peter -- "I only hope to read this in the future" - Peter Kelly -- I read the newspaper avidly. It is my one form of continuous fiction. -- Aneurin Bevan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list