From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FODJa-0000Aw-Vn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:28:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2SCS4jM011826; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:28:04 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2SCOFCl021371 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:24:15 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D4A1A1F4B50 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:24:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64D61F4B23 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:24:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTP id 12203222 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:24:14 +0200 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc upgrade, should it upgrade? Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:24:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <4428D27E.30604@vista-express.com> In-Reply-To: <4428D27E.30604@vista-express.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603281424.14314.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 97bc772e-996a-4f74-86ca-6ae1424072cf X-Archives-Hash: 11ddd1cc89f0d42e941e6037ca9da41f On Tuesday 28 March 2006 08:06, Teresa and Dale wrote: > Hi, > > I upgraded gcc a while back. I thought I read somewhere that it is best > to just upgrade on occasion with the major upgrades. Should this be > > upgraded or should I mask it? This is what I get: > > root@smoker / # emerge -up world > > > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > > > > Calculating world dependencies ...done! > > [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.13-r1 [1.3.12-r6] > > [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5-r1 [3.4.5] > > [ebuild U ] app-office/scribus-1.3.3 [1.3.2-r1] > > [ebuild U ] sys-apps/dbus-0.61-r1 [0.61] > > root@smoker / # > > I really don't want to do a emerge -e world or rebuild a lot right now. > I am glad to see the new Scribus though. ;-) > you don't have to. As long as you are not updating to gcc4 you never need to make an emerge -e world. Not because of gcc updates and never because of glibc updates. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list