From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FMP31-0006f5-07 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:36:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2NCZKq8003277; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:35:20 GMT Received: from explorer.cz (mail.explorer.cz [81.0.233.73]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2NCTsxf015289 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:29:54 GMT Received: (qmail 20193 invoked by uid 64017); 23 Mar 2006 12:29:52 -0000 Received: from Petr.Kocmid@project-bhairava.org by mail by uid 64011 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (avgd: 7.0. spamassassin: 3.0.3. Clear:RC:0(85.70.218.199):SA:0(0.0/4.0):. Processed in 0.182561 secs); 23 Mar 2006 12:29:52 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.1?) (petr.kocmid@project-bhairava.org@85.70.218.199) by mail.explorer.cz with SMTP; 23 Mar 2006 12:29:51 -0000 From: Petr Kocmid To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE version Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:29:31 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200603212113.16353.contiemilio@virgilio.it> <200603211942.18707.bss03@volumehost.net> <200603220831.14253.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> In-Reply-To: <200603220831.14253.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603231329.32161.Petr.Kocmid@project-bhairava.org> X-Archives-Salt: 515d58e7-a839-4022-bf2b-17052a9f75c9 X-Archives-Hash: c979c0a5a304ab4dfabd863a750c83a7 On Wednesday 22 March 2006 08:31, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 02:42, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > > But the times, that gentoo was pretty actual in the stable tree are > > > over. > > You do realize the above sentence makes no freakin' sense, right? > nope. > If I had realized that, I would have not written it. > Gentoo was once VERY up to date, but than the 'stable mania' started and > since then, gentoo needs way to much time to get new versions into the > stable tree. > 3.5.0 is out for ages. > 3.5.1 is out for ages > Stable is 3.4.3... > that is so sad. I am already running 3.5.1 for ages. Perhaps ' so sadness' is no proper mental attitude to achieve the upgrade. package.keywords is my friend, 300+ packages at bleeding edge versions. -- Petr -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list