From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1FK65v-0004CH-2l
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:57:43 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2H3ufJ8026095;
	Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:56:41 GMT
Received: from ender.volumehost.net (adsl-69-154-123-202.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.202])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2H3qafS022182
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:52:36 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6B810979
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:52:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ender.volumehost.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (ender.volumehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 29676-09 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
 Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:52:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ip70-178-212-144.ks.ks.cox.net (ip70-178-212-144.ks.ks.cox.net [70.178.212.144])
	(using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B467A107D3
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:52:33 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@volumehost.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] dd if=/dev/dvd of=backup.iso
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 21:52:32 -0600
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <1142373608.25339.42.camel@sysconcept.ca> <20060316165850.578d1c91@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <1142532703.16729.50.camel@sysconcept.ca>
In-Reply-To: <1142532703.16729.50.camel@sysconcept.ca>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200603162152.32813.bss03@volumehost.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at volumehost.net
X-Archives-Salt: 1547dd3e-d817-4718-b1da-8d4027115f54
X-Archives-Hash: 25e42bdef7c50ebec7c585db1b3d37eb

On Thursday 16 March 2006 12:11, Joseph <syscon@interbaun.com> wrote about 
'Re: [gentoo-user] dd if=/dev/dvd of=backup.iso':
> The strange part is that when I mount the same DVD in amd64-machine all
> directory and files are listed in small letters (and I know they should
> be all CAPS).
>
> Though, I don't see what difference it could make, but why one machine
> list the files and directories in small letter and the other one in
> caps.

One machine is mounting as iso9660; the other is mounting as UDF.  The one 
mounting as UDF is more correct.  This won't make a difference to dd 
(since it operates below the file system) but would affect cp, ll, or any 
other program that required the drive to be mounted.

I used to rip DVDs and CDs using dd w/ conv=noerror.  I find I actually get 
better results with a tool designed to read CDs specifically.  I don't 
know if it is because they better moderate the speed of the drive, or if 
they are simply cognizant of the error correction bits on the disk, but 
I'll never go back to reading CDs or DVDs with dd again.

-- 
"If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability."
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list