From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FEE2N-0004pl-14 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:13:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SN9SFH022974; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:09:28 GMT Received: from cicero0.cybercity.dk (cicero0.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.52]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SMuk0T032255 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:56:47 GMT Received: from user2.cybercity.dk (user2.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.35]) by cicero0.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10D967878A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:57:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17]) by user2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A43E286763 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:57:23 +0100 (CET) From: Bo Andresen To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 3d rendering with dri radeon Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:57:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200602171203.22279.bo.andresen@gmail.com> <200602282216.44757.bo.andresen@gmail.com> <200602282316.40206.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200602282316.40206.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602282357.23486.bo.andresen@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: aa82b7ca-863c-4a9a-a170-02578a3c5798 X-Archives-Hash: 4f130732ef1cea5504540a60302b04cb While the two kernels are the same version from portage they have of course different EXTRAVERSION. For the kernel I compiled for dri I simply added '-dri' to EXTRAVERSION. So when running uname -r it yielded 2.6.15-r1-dri. The previous kernel which I am running now lacks the '-dri'. On Tuesday 28 February 2006 23:16, Benno Schulenberg wrote: > Bo Andresen wrote: > > On Tuesday 28 February 2006 21:31, Benno Schulenberg wrote: > > > Are you certain that the radeon module being used is the one > > > from that old kernel and not the one from x11-drm? > > > > I am very certain... but then again, I've been so before in this > > thread and yet been terribly wrong. Do you think there is any way > > to check it? > > Yes. Unmerge x11-drm, reboot, and see if it still works. :) Unmerging x11-drm does not remove the kernel due to CONFIG_PROTECT. --- cfgpro obj /lib/modules/2.6.15-gentoo-r1-dri/x11-drm/radeon.ko --- cfgpro obj /lib/modules/2.6.15-gentoo-r1-dri/x11-drm/r128.ko --- cfgpro obj /lib/modules/2.6.15-gentoo-r1-dri/x11-drm/mach64.ko --- cfgpro obj /lib/modules/2.6.15-gentoo-r1-dri/x11-drm/drm.ko --- cfgpro dir /lib/modules/2.6.15-gentoo-r1-dri/x11-drm I do, however, believe that this output proves that I am not running the x11-drm modules since it does contain '-dri'. > > Kernel version has not changed - 2.6.15-r1. > > Yeah, then it's the x11-drm radeon module you're using, not the one > from the kernel. If it had been a diffent version (2.6.14, say), > the module would have been in a different subdir in /lib/modules and > wouldn't get used. I'm not really sure what you by this. Why does that mean that I'm using the x11-drm modules? -- Bo Andresen -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list