From: Bo Andresen <bo.andresen@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 3d rendering with dri radeon
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:39:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602281439.17634.bo.andresen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200602281313.33963.bo.andresen@gmail.com>
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 13:13, Bo Andresen wrote:
> I am very surprised by this but it turns out direct rendering is working
> now with the kernel modules. And the performance is quite a bit better than
> before:
[SNIP]
Well, when I conducted the tests that yielded a performance of 228 FPS with
dri I forgot that I had F@H running in the background. This makes the whole
difference in performance. By starting that service I get down to the same
lousy framerates with dri from the kernel and by stopping it again the
performance goes up again.
So all in all the performance without F@H and with dri is 5-6 times better
without F@H and without dri.
> I am clueless as to why this is working now when it wasn't before...
This still does not explain why this is working now when it wasn't before I
compiled a kernel without dri and emerged x11-drm. But hey, it works... ;)
--
Bo Andresen
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-28 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-17 11:03 [gentoo-user] 3d rendering with dri radeon Bo Andresen
2006-02-17 11:20 ` Ghaith Hachem
2006-02-22 22:45 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-17 14:25 ` Andrei Slavoiu
2006-02-17 18:29 ` Benno Schulenberg
2006-02-18 5:09 ` Bruce Burden
2006-02-18 16:02 ` Benno Schulenberg
2006-02-22 22:52 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-23 20:19 ` Benno Schulenberg
2006-02-23 21:44 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-23 22:30 ` Benno Schulenberg
2006-02-23 22:51 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-23 23:04 ` Benno Schulenberg
2006-02-23 23:29 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-24 19:14 ` Benno Schulenberg
2006-02-24 22:57 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-24 23:36 ` Benno Schulenberg
2006-02-24 23:54 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-25 14:03 ` Benno Schulenberg
2006-02-25 17:42 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-26 4:02 ` Bruce Burden
2006-02-26 4:39 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-26 5:56 ` Richard Fish
2006-02-28 20:36 ` Benno Schulenberg
2006-03-01 16:30 ` Bruce Burden
2006-03-02 2:48 ` Bob Sanders
2006-02-25 17:50 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-28 12:13 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-28 13:39 ` Bo Andresen [this message]
2006-02-28 20:31 ` Benno Schulenberg
2006-02-28 21:16 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-28 22:16 ` Benno Schulenberg
2006-02-28 22:57 ` Bo Andresen
2006-02-25 5:36 ` Bruce Burden
2006-02-25 14:10 ` Benno Schulenberg
2006-02-18 16:55 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2006-02-18 18:03 ` [gentoo-user] " Rafael Fernández López
2006-02-18 18:44 ` Mariusz Pękala
2006-02-18 20:32 ` Andrei Slavoiu
2006-02-18 21:47 ` Jerry McBride
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200602281439.17634.bo.andresen@gmail.com \
--to=bo.andresen@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox