On 2006-02-25 13:34:28 -0600 (Sat, Feb), Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > > So, betas shouldn't ever be ~arch?  Or is your definition of stable
> > > broad enough to include betas?
> >
> > Entirely dependent on the upstream. I've had Vim beta releases in
> > ~arch, for example, because I'm confident in upstream's ability to do
> > beta releases without screwing up.
> 
> So, it's based on the collective opinion of the gentoo developers?  
> Wouldn't it be better to put that in the hands of the gentoo user?

IMHO it already is. It's called PORTAGE_OVERLAY.

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by "grep -i virus $MESSAGE"
Trust me.