Re: [gentoo-user] What happens with masked packages?

[Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1364 bytes --]

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:57:43 -0600 "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
<bss03@volumehost.com> wrote:
| > ~arch means a package is a candidate for going into arch after
| > further testing, if said testing does not turn up new bugs. This
| > means that both the ebuild *and* the package should be likely to be
| > stable.
| 
| So, betas shouldn't ever be ~arch?  Or is your definition of stable
| broad enough to include betas?

Entirely dependent on the upstream. I've had Vim beta releases in
~arch, for example, because I'm confident in upstream's ability to do
beta releases without screwing up.

| > -* means the package is in some way architecture or hardware
| > independent (e.g. a binary only package), and so will only run on
| > archs that are explicitly listed.
| 
| So, I guess glibc-2.3.6-r3.ebuild is using -* incorrectly?

Probably.

| > Any package setting KEYWORDS="-*" and nothing else is abusing -*,
| > and will flag a warning on the QA checkers.
| 
| You mean like gcc-4.1.0_pre20060219.ebuild?

Yyyyup.

The -* abuse is one of the many things on QA's list of "stuff we want
to get fixed". However, it's considered extremely low priority on
existing packages.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]