From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FD10J-0001Ya-Aq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:06:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1PF5cPH019165; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:05:38 GMT Received: from ender.volumehost.net (adsl-69-154-123-202.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1PF1Yj9025569 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:01:34 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61A4CC28 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ender.volumehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ender.volumehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25140-14 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from monster (ip70-178-175-2.ks.ks.cox.net [70.178.175.2]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34258D270 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:01:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:01:22 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <440030E4.3000505@mid.message-center.info> <4400350B.4030104@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <4400350B.4030104@gmx.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602250901.22219.bss03@volumehost.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at volumehost.net X-Archives-Salt: 8212ffde-5fe3-45ad-aba7-da29ce514b33 X-Archives-Hash: 90b4e3be47266eedba1d245bfe0bf4a2 On Saturday 25 February 2006 04:44, Jarry wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question': > Hm, about half year ago I asked which fs to use. I counted > votes, and ext3 won (reiser was 2nd). Nobody mentioned that > reiserfs can be resized on-line, ext3 not (only off-line). > It seems I have to revaluate results of that voting... I think your main problem was not using a Condorcet Method (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method), there are a lot of problems, pointed out by Arrow, with simple methods like parity or IRV. ;) -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. bss03@volumehost.com ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list