From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FCfFn-0001nb-Ql for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:53:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1OFpsQt023997; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:51:54 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1OFlAr2026180 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:47:10 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id AB9A61FFCA8 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:47:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797B31FFC9D for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:47:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTP id 11486802 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:47:10 +0100 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:47:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <1140516464.23492.2.camel@neuromancer.home.net> <200602241516.58344.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <43FF1A29.2030105@mid.message-center.info> In-Reply-To: <43FF1A29.2030105@mid.message-center.info> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602241647.10005.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: b405c298-e30e-4f68-b94e-ec3ce72ada0b X-Archives-Hash: 0c24ee9232ddc33ccc2c20bbbc7bce96 On Friday 24 February 2006 15:37, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > On Friday 24 February 2006 07:00, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> Alexander Kirillov wrote: > >> > If I got it right here's the link for those interested: > >> > http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_speed_up_portage_with_cdb > >> > >> Does this work with recent portage releases? > > > > it stopped some weeks ago - but in the gentoo forums was updated > > instructions. > > I am not sure, if the instructions in the wiki got updated but that is > > easy to find out. > > Try it. If it does not work, go to the forum ;) > > *LOL* - Now, that's what I'd call a "practical" approach :) > > I just wondered, because even in the most recent portage > releases, there's an einfo text stating, that the cdb > caching module needs to be rewritten. http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-261580.html is the thread. But beware, in /usr/portage/modules you need this: portdbapi.auxdbmodule = cache.cdb.database eclass_cache.dbmodule = cache.cdb.database not that: portdbapi.auxdbmodule = portage_db_cdb.database eclass_cache.dbmodule = portage_db_cdb.database that is the only change I remember at the moment (and which did not went into the wiki). -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list