From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FCQwE-0003sI-8h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:36:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1O0Xcv0019220; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:33:38 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1O0RL3T016034 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:27:21 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 39568201083 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:27:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B93C201022 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:27:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTP id 11471763 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:27:20 +0100 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:27:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <1140516464.23492.2.camel@neuromancer.home.net> <200602231547.43210.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <43FE479D.90203@infoline.su> In-Reply-To: <43FE479D.90203@infoline.su> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602240127.19817.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: f073ba7d-fd24-4108-a2cb-d361bc3f5483 X-Archives-Hash: 88e1c4fb4631d245b29ae3bd7711b5bb On Friday 24 February 2006 00:39, Alexander Kirillov wrote: > >>BSD ports system may not be as complex as Gentoo's > >>and needs more attention to maintain port dependencies > >>but this "abuse of make" IS REAL FAST. > > > > portage is REAL SLOW. > > So you should install/use cdb, which makes the whole rsync/update process > > REAL FAST. > > > >>If you sync regularly it's usually within 5 min. > > > > it is, with cdb. > > Thanks for the hint. > If I got it right here's the link for those interested: > http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_speed_up_portage_with_cdb > Looks very interesting and I wonder why is it not in portage yet? well ,the chat log tells you why ;) but you also look into the forum. A portage update broke it for me, and in the forum were updated instructions - I don't know, if the gentoowiki was updated too. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list