From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FCHyP-0002Qt-0F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:01:41 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1NEwZPj010647; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:58:35 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1NElihg011319 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:47:44 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C2E092008FA for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:47:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA712008F6 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:47:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTP id 11457368 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:47:43 +0100 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:47:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <1140516464.23492.2.camel@neuromancer.home.net> <1140660283.1984.23.camel@neuromancer.home.net> <43FD8DCA.5060702@infoline.su> In-Reply-To: <43FD8DCA.5060702@infoline.su> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602231547.43210.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 5f53add1-ffe1-4431-a968-ab7fc0d19bec X-Archives-Hash: 3f26d14da173e756989296895b896304 On Thursday 23 February 2006 11:26, Alexander Kirillov wrote: > >>I already think Gentoo base system requirements are a bit heavy just > >> having python in there. (I'm trying to run gentoo on my WRT54G 1.1; > >> storage over nfs/nbd) It would be completely over-the-top to require > >> Modula 3 support as well. > > > > Just tried cvsup on a FreeBSD box (in vmware) and it totally sucked. > > Took 1hr 20 min to update on a 512KB DSL. > > > > Link wasn't even saturated! Might as well be on 56K connection. DL rate > > max I've seen was 8KB/s > > BSD ports system may not be as complex as Gentoo's > and needs more attention to maintain port dependencies > but this "abuse of make" IS REAL FAST. portage is REAL SLOW. So you should install/use cdb, which makes the whole rsync/update process REAL FAST. > If you sync regularly it's usually within 5 min. it is, with cdb. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list