From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FC1o3-0004kI-UJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:45:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1MLhwYJ022235; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:43:58 GMT Received: from wp045.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp045.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.132.52]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1MLcPg7017373 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:38:26 GMT Received: by wp045.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.43 using esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) from port-212-202-86-47.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.86.47] helo=hoppsie.born) id 1FC1gn-0000Yz-SQ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:38:25 +0100 From: Rafael Bugajewski Organization: =?utf-8?q?Universit=C3=A4t?= Bremen To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What happens with masked packages? Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:38:21 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200602222055.42113.tcoulon@decoulon.ch> <43FCC33D.7000303@joat.com> <200602222138.01006.tcoulon@decoulon.ch> In-Reply-To: <200602222138.01006.tcoulon@decoulon.ch> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart103706110.q1ACKNKaaB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602222238.24930.rb@bugajewski.de> X-Archives-Salt: eb4a22f4-edb0-48d6-84ec-3cbe948484ca X-Archives-Hash: a2b4e1836071d6ca88248c5c7722099f --nextPart103706110.q1ACKNKaaB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Thierry de Coulon wrote: > Thanks. Does not seem to me to be the best solution, though: if a package > is masked, many users won't install it, so what's the absence of bug repo= rt > indicating? You can also file a bug report that a package which you thing is stable is= =20 still masked. In this case a developer should examine the requested package= a=20 little bit deeper. --nextPart103706110.q1ACKNKaaB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD/NnQ54MLbyoQXM4RAgJCAKCLYNE97C3QwzrrMMnEXEURiYfY5ACfQZzl plQ6OTObUbhbmI/EKKkTlt8= =DUz8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart103706110.q1ACKNKaaB-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list