From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FBqlA-0000ec-Eb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:58:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1M9vBPw002999; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:57:11 GMT Received: from ender.volumehost.net (adsl-69-154-123-202.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1M9r58R002344 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:53:06 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B90C1EB for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ender.volumehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ender.volumehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04806-08 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from monster (ip70-178-175-2.ks.ks.cox.net [70.178.175.2]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC05C137 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:53:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 03:53:01 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <1140516464.23492.2.camel@neuromancer.home.net> <200602210524.44868.bss03@volumehost.com> <43FBB26B.40904@sarai.net> In-Reply-To: <43FBB26B.40904@sarai.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602220353.01808.bss03@volumehost.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at volumehost.net X-Archives-Salt: 0245cbe5-ca36-4ac9-ac55-741f73053925 X-Archives-Hash: 25e2f799e829aab70179fb04232cc3f8 On Tuesday 21 February 2006 18:38, Aniruddha Shankar wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CVSup vs Gentoo's Rsync': > That I can live with. It's the updating portage cache - especially the > long wait at 50% that drags. Go ~ for portage, I don't experience such a delay. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. bss03@volumehost.com ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list