From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FBbTG-0002Oj-FN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:38:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1LHbJnS008069; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:37:19 GMT Received: from mach.qrypto.org (connectioncable-084.headoff.net [217.30.222.84] (may be forged)) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1LHWSP2030894 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:32:28 GMT Received: (qmail 12840 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2006 17:32:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (gentoo@192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with ESMTPA; 21 Feb 2006 17:32:27 -0000 From: Rumen Yotov Organization: personal To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] etc/host.conf: line 24: bad command `mdns off' Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:32:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <1140483471.10641.4.camel@orpheus> <43FB3927.802@pnpitalia.it> <43FB4412.3060804@joat.com> In-Reply-To: <43FB4412.3060804@joat.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4026500.kvCdzAL4ES"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602211932.19481.rumen@qrypto.org> X-Archives-Salt: 61661cc4-8134-489e-83a0-64e9f5b784db X-Archives-Hash: 63b3e1efbdaf311d4ebc4b17c3844684 --nextPart4026500.kvCdzAL4ES Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On Tuesday 21 February 2006 18:47, Dave Nebinger wrote: > Francesco Riosa wrote: > >> How about removing line 24? Or couldn't you think of that on your own? > > > > and you could not think that this kind of answer is _wrong_ under every > > corner you could look at it ? > > How about because that is set from the default installation and that 95% > of the folks on this list couldn't even tell you what it is for and when > it is appropriate to change the setting? > > How about the high probability that this person is not running their own > DNS and is using /etc/hosts for local name resolution? > > Or how about the fact that glibc 2.3.6-r3 (as 2.3.6 in general) is > masked in Portage indicating that you should expect problems if you're > going to build your box on an unstable version of glibc? > Please don't scare me, it's in testing (not masked). At least 2.3.6-r2|3. ->*2.3.6 *2.3.6-r1 ~2.3.6-r2 ~2.3.6-r3 ...SKIP... Rumen --nextPart4026500.kvCdzAL4ES Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD+06jNbtuTtsWD3wRAhCEAKCccfZ3QKYPpK/dH0FTbxJ0Vqe4YwCfZLjf kVsux7DEVAQonc63RBq9iPs= =P5+c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4026500.kvCdzAL4ES-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list