From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F9qcg-0008B8-Ad for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:25:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1GLJMNr004796; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:19:22 GMT Received: from psmtp03.wxs.nl (psmtp03.wxs.nl [195.121.247.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1GKxLgV024096 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:59:21 GMT Received: from graskamp (ip51cfa1ef.direct-adsl.nl [81.207.161.239]) by psmtp03.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.07 (built Jun 24 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IUS0030RSYWO2@psmtp03.wxs.nl> for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:59:21 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:59:20 +0100 From: Benno Schulenberg Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updating glibc-2.3.5-r2: segmentation fault... (part 2) In-reply-to: <43F4D87E.3040104@gmx.net> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Message-id: <200602162159.20553.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <43F374B9.20103@gmx.net> <1140115383.25550.9.camel@mach.qrypto.org> <43F4D87E.3040104@gmx.net> X-Archives-Salt: fd9bbe85-6dcb-4fe6-ad0c-958e4d224b40 X-Archives-Hash: 80a3d738b4f305cf4b02af0849157a45 Jarry wrote: > So now (I hope!) my system is in consistent state, as it was > before my little "experiment" Well, you have had a kernel oops, and it looks like you may have had another (the emerge of gcc that did nothing for 4 hours), so... something doesn't seem quite right. Keep watching your logs. > With one exception. When I now check: > > gcc-config -l > [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4 * > [2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4-hardened > [3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4-hardenednopie > [4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4-hardenednopiessp > [5] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4-hardenednossp > > Previously it was: > [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4 * > [2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4-hardenednopie > [3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4-hardenednopiessp > [4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4-hardenednossp > [5] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4-vanilla > > Do I have to make worry about that missing vanilla-profile? No. Look closer: when using the "hardened" flag, the default compiler is the hardened one, when not using that flag, the default compiler is the vanilla one. Benno -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list