From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F9lxY-0002af-HA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:26:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1GGM3YN029306; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:22:03 GMT Received: from mail.uni-bamberg.de (urz52.uni-bamberg.de [141.13.240.52]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1GG94jQ012704 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:09:05 GMT Received: from mi016148.wiai.uni-bamberg.de [141.13.16.148] by mail.uni-bamberg.de with ESMTP (SMTPD-8.22) id A28C0318; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:04:28 +0100 From: Martin Eisenhardt Organization: Bamberg University To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How many GB for / partition? Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:09:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <43F49160.4020701@mid.message-center.info> <13369.1140102624@www076.gmx.net> <43F49A8B.6090308@mid.message-center.info> In-Reply-To: <43F49A8B.6090308@mid.message-center.info> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2969701.JKG2QtjZrR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602161709.04712.martin.eisenhardt@wiai.uni-bamberg.de> X-Archives-Salt: 25b9e4c5-51e1-42ef-a2a7-d459f8810415 X-Archives-Hash: 497db15892cdcc24310d9e42c2f1451b --nextPart2969701.JKG2QtjZrR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday February 16 2006 16:30, Alexander Skwar wrote: > jarry@gmx.net wrote: > > Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> Hm, as I said before - have a look at LVM. It makes > >> life *SO* much easier. I don't quite get, why people > >> still do the old style partitioning. > > > > Correct me if I am wrong, but with lvm you do not have > > control over physical placement of your partitions. Right? > > Right. > No, wrong, please see my other message. You *can* tell LVM where to put LVs but you do not *have* to. In the latter= =20 case, LVM chooses where to put the LV. Regards Martin =2D-=20 Dipl. Wirtsch.Inf.(Univ.) Martin Eisenhardt Otto-Friedrich-Universit=E4t Bamberg =46akult=E4t Wirtschaftinformatik und Angewandte Informatik Lehrstuhl f=FCr Medieninformatik D-96045 Bamberg fon: +49 (951) 863-2856 fax: +49 (951) 863-2852 www: http://www.mneisen.org --nextPart2969701.JKG2QtjZrR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD9KOgVUsW4y0BHEIRAlVAAKCu1v1Myr2K6JWofbb4njHWLPzkKACbBdU6 xafSd0ZxW+ktUpdEHnIiUG4= =fHp/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2969701.JKG2QtjZrR-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list