[gentoo-user] Xine-ui masked?

[gentoo-user] Xine-ui masked?

[Daniel Pielmeier]

Hello,

recently i have installed xine -ui.

A few days before when i do

emerge -pv --deep --newuse --update world

it shows me the following output


These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating world dependencies
!!! Packages for the following atoms are either all
!!! masked or don't exist:
media-video/xine-ui

 ...done!

Total size of downloads: 0 kB


Is xine-ui marked as masked recently?

At http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=xine-ui it is marked stable.

emerge -s xine-ui shows me


Searching...
[ Results for search key : xine-ui ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]

*  media-video/xine-ui [ Masked ]
      Latest version available: 0.99.4-r3
      Latest version installed: 0.99.3
      Size of downloaded files: 2,496 kB
      Homepage:    http://xine.sourceforge.net/
      Description: Xine movie player
      License:     GPL-2


What is wrong here?

Thank you in advance

Daniel Pielmeier
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Xine-ui masked?

[Mariusz Pękala]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2515 bytes --]

On 2006-02-05 16:51:47 +0100 (Sun, Feb), Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> recently i have installed xine -ui.
> 
> A few days before when i do
> emerge -pv --deep --newuse --update world
> it shows me the following output
> 
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> Calculating world dependencies
> !!! Packages for the following atoms are either all
> !!! masked or don't exist:
> media-video/xine-ui
> 
>  ...done!
> 
> Total size of downloads: 0 kB
> 
> Is xine-ui marked as masked recently?
> 
> At http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=xine-ui it is marked stable.
> 
> emerge -s xine-ui shows me
> 
> Searching...
> [ Results for search key : xine-ui ]
> [ Applications found : 1 ]
> 
> *  media-video/xine-ui [ Masked ]
>       Latest version available: 0.99.4-r3
>       Latest version installed: 0.99.3
>       Size of downloaded files: 2,496 kB
>       Homepage:    http://xine.sourceforge.net/
>       Description: Xine movie player
>       License:     GPL-2
> 
> What is wrong here?

I am not sure, but check what you do have in
/usr/portage/media-video/xine-ui . Just a few hours after my last sync I
have got just one ebuild - stable xine-ui-0.99.4-r3.ebuild

If you find it, check its contents - what keywords are there for
your architecture.

I see: KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 ~hppa ppc ppc64 sparc x86"

If your arch has proper keyword, then look inside
/etc/portage/package.mask and search for xine-ui in
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask
(grep xine /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask)

You may want to check other package.mask files in your portage profile
hirarchy.

Having said all this, I suggest you issue the command:
  emerge -pv xine-ui
as it usually, pretty verbosely, says what is going on.

Example:
  #  emerge -pv toxine
  These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
  Calculating dependencies
  !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "toxine" have been masked.
  !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
  - media-video/toxine-0.6.3 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword)
  # Diego Pettenò <flameeyes@gentoo.org> (18 August 2005)
  # Toxine needs to be verified with upstream for a few issues.
  For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
  refer to the Gentoo Handbook.

You do have the latest portage, don't you?

HTH

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by "grep -i virus $MESSAGE"
Trust me.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Xine-ui masked?

[Daniel Pielmeier]

Under /usr/portage/media-video/xine-ui i find the
xine-ui-0.99.4-r3.ebuild and stable it is stable too.

KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 ~hppa ppc ppc64 sparc x86"

I am running gentoo on x86 so i think it has to be stable.

I have no masked xine-ui versions in

/etc/portage/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask.

emerge -pv xine-ui

shows me

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "xine-ui" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
- media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
- media-video/xine-ui-0.99.3-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)

For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
refer to the Gentoo Handbook.

I use portage version 2.0.54

You mentioned that there are other package.mask files in the portage
profile, but where are they?

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Xine-ui masked?

[Mariusz Pękala]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2797 bytes --]

On 2006-02-05 23:08:13 +0100 (Sun, Feb), Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Under /usr/portage/media-video/xine-ui i find the
> xine-ui-0.99.4-r3.ebuild and stable it is stable too.
> 
> KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 ~hppa ppc ppc64 sparc x86"
> 
> I am running gentoo on x86 so i think it has to be stable.
> 
> I have no masked xine-ui versions in
> 
> /etc/portage/package.mask
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask.
> 
> emerge -pv xine-ui
> 
> shows me
> 
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "xine-ui" have been masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> request:
> - media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
> - media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
> - media-video/xine-ui-0.99.3-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)

I assume you have not synced recently? I have only one ebuild, you have
three.
They are masked by keyword - and you have just said that in
xine-ui-0.99.4-r3.ebuild KEYWORDS contained 'x86', not '~x86'.

So, I feel some strange disturbance in force...

Just out of curiosity: try 'grep xine /etc/portage/*' ?
Have you set portage overlay?

> I use portage version 2.0.54

Same here.

> You mentioned that there are other package.mask files in the portage
> profile, but where are they?


$ find /usr/portage/profiles/ -name package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/hardened/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/default-darwin/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/default-darwin/macos/10.3/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/default-darwin/macos/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/default-darwin/macos/10.4/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/alpha/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/alpha/2004.3/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/sparc/sparc32/2005.0/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/sparc/sparc32/2006.0/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/sparc/sparc32/2005.1/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/sparc/sparc32/2004.3/package.mask
[...]

These files may be traversed by portage when it 'combines' the profile
following 'parent' file in your profile directory and in each directory
pointed by the 'parent' file. See:
$ ls -l /etc/make.profile
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 48 kwi  7  2005 /etc/make.profile -> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0

$ cat /etc/make.profile/parent
..
$ cat /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/parent
..
$ cat /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/parent
../base
  
  and so on..

- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by "grep -i virus $MESSAGE"
Trust me.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]