From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1F5Utj-0008Ci-4H
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:24:47 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k14LNZU9024522;
	Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:23:35 GMT
Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk (rutherford.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.142])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k14LINIg011355
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:18:23 GMT
Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=desiato.digimed.co.uk)
	by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1F5Unf-0007dN-GC
	for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:18:31 +0000
Received: from krikkit.digimed.co.uk (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE50142084A
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  4 Feb 2006 21:18:30 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:18:15 +0000
From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] So O.K.
Message-ID: <20060204211815.10c7ad91@krikkit.digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1139086976.10446.9.camel@camille.espersunited.com>
References: <1139061772.4811.8.camel@frankies.at_home>
	<200602040411.50072.beaucox@hawaii.rr.com>
	<1139065711.5323.10.camel@frankies.at_home>
	<20060204153010.5a9ddf85@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
	<1139070970.10446.5.camel@camille.espersunited.com>
	<20060204202745.06dc1e14@krikkit.digimed.co.uk>
	<1139086976.10446.9.camel@camille.espersunited.com>
Organization: Digital Media Production
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.11; powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667  FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_U3tCCrJ_5Z_zqWzwivnL8=C";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.69.83.178]
X-Archives-Salt: 8a42cd24-a211-42d8-bcc4-31372c884573
X-Archives-Hash: e66b7f4134e2f51764bdebeb2b2f63ba

--Sig_U3tCCrJ_5Z_zqWzwivnL8=C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:02:56 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote:

> > I think the flames started when the OP made a basic mistake and
> > decided the whole distro was unsuitable for any serious use because
> > of his error.

> That could be true, but why do we let it continue?

I don't know, why are you continuing what would have been a dead thread
by now? :)


--=20
Neil Bothwick

Things which must be shipped together as a set, aren't.

--Sig_U3tCCrJ_5Z_zqWzwivnL8=C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD5Rolum4al0N1GQMRAqTCAKCR3nycsA8OOh4F1j40hICoxZImswCfbc4X
F3r88JApazjXvhFtdo9zHOM=
=HnSi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_U3tCCrJ_5Z_zqWzwivnL8=C--
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list