From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EwJrB-0002Qh-4L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:48:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0ADkHq1022170; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:46:17 GMT Received: from mgw-ext01.nokia.com (mgw-ext01.nokia.com [131.228.20.93]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0ADg6II030514 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:42:06 GMT Received: from esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh107.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.143]) by mgw-ext01.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k0ADg0hP005965 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:42:06 +0200 Received: from esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.28]) by esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:42:02 +0200 Received: from louisa.europe.nokia.com ([172.25.104.26]) by esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:42:02 +0200 From: Dirk Heinrichs Organization: Capgemini Deutschland GmbH To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LUKS Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:42:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <7babdf270601090857w75cd06d6o88a0fee6e8e30c49@mail.gmail.com> <7babdf270601100513j3ebca1eam743c30af3cbfbaa3@mail.gmail.com> <200601100731.08605.bss03@volumehost.com> In-Reply-To: <200601100731.08605.bss03@volumehost.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1562233.e7N8qrNVfW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601101442.02358.ext-dirk.heinrichs@nokia.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2006 13:42:02.0548 (UTC) FILETIME=[A3288F40:01C615EB] X-Archives-Salt: 928655c2-409c-47d6-bba1-09b860a442b8 X-Archives-Hash: c8e567b5eeda0422998dff4e91692ffe --nextPart1562233.e7N8qrNVfW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2006 14:31 schrieb ext Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.: > > What about the performance, is it too different from plain partition > > usage? > > I never noticed the difference when I was using aes-loop on a 2GHz > laptop. That said, it will depend on the algorithm you choose and the CPU > you have available. Also, I /think/ aes-loop was supposed to be faster > than dm-crypt, but I believe the kernel's implementation of aes (and > maybe other ciphers) has gotten faster since the last benchmarks I saw. That's especially true on x86 where aes is implemented in assembly. Due to= =20 this it is even faster than blowfish. On non-x86 systems (where aes is=20 coded in C), blowfish is said to be faster. Bye... Dirk =2D-=20 Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: dirk.heinrichs@capgemini.com Hambornerstra=DFe 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40472 D=FCsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net --nextPart1562233.e7N8qrNVfW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.19 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDw7mq8NVtnsLkZ7sRAnFjAKCRirPGEPHByIJJJ65D9lSSOQgO6ACeOx/h aRttt+xcFKtkwzZWSu6VnD4= =78i5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1562233.e7N8qrNVfW-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list