From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EuT5t-0005uF-I8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 11:15:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k05BDBmd007759; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:13:11 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k05BAn3O001829 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:10:49 GMT Received: from 193-172.dsl1.guernsey.net ([213.133.193.172] helo=pohl.lj.net) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EuT16-0002ia-Kz for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 11:10:48 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:10:38 +0000 From: Tom Martin <slarti@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] package conflict on update Message-ID: <20060105111038.1e4dca70@pohl.lj.net> In-Reply-To: <9b1675090601042329j667448d6w2e2ec01ecc05ce66@mail.gmail.com> References: <9b1675090601042329j667448d6w2e2ec01ecc05ce66@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc1 (GTK+ 2.8.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_iX0gtfvR7CYdZ1cGEmjT6o2; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 3b803956-da99-47b9-b33e-8fa2f837911c X-Archives-Hash: b416d88eca8cbe0260dc52305a9d2459 --Sig_iX0gtfvR7CYdZ1cGEmjT6o2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 00:29:57 -0700 Trenton Adams <trenton.d.adams@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, so I get the output below when trying to merge after a sync today. > My guess is that the openmotif package was made into two separate > packages, correct? >=20 > To the portage developers, how could this be handled? Perhaps emerge > could somehow figure out the reason for such a conflict, and then > automatically unmerge the original package? Not really a question to the portage developers -- just unmerge openmotif (the blocker) and continue as normal. --=20 Tom Martin, http://dev.gentoo.org/~slarti AMD64, net-mail, shell-tools, vim, recruiters Gentoo Linux --Sig_iX0gtfvR7CYdZ1cGEmjT6o2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDvP60j5KihLXE/4kRAn7MAJ41AfCIOFteGxWiYqJQcOjeP7ikpgCeNGOC PnD3pNReaY87YHD0ePyaxRA= =RR6u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_iX0gtfvR7CYdZ1cGEmjT6o2-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list