From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Etiav-0001fO-3B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 09:36:41 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k039YS9Y023567; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:34:28 GMT Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk (rutherford.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.142]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k039WMbH032087 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:32:23 GMT Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=desiato.digimed.co.uk) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EtiWk-0002mV-IH for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 09:32:22 +0000 Received: from krikkit.digimed.co.uk (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386A91410336 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:32:21 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:32:16 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] file dates on system totally bodged Message-ID: <20060103093216.6e1a4702@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <7bef1f890601021944y1d19d74fr558a86c837d27705@mail.gmail.com> References: <7bef1f890601011657xa050126n9e418ebb3a76d9cb@mail.gmail.com> <20060102094525.09423f21@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <7bef1f890601020414r7a767880nc4eeb0de902d8834@mail.gmail.com> <20060102133207.00a242e5@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <7bef1f890601020610h77b0fcb5p492202b5b1fbef71@mail.gmail.com> <7bef1f890601021944y1d19d74fr558a86c837d27705@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc2 (GTK+ 2.8.9; powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_TRY1BeJb93MxJMY_.VhruMt; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.69.83.178] X-Archives-Salt: 2733dcc8-f257-4a6a-a78d-99cf4303941c X-Archives-Hash: 03a405fcce2f218416c6420dc6235338 --Sig_TRY1BeJb93MxJMY_.VhruMt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 13:44:09 +1000, Alan E. Davis wrote: > If I touch these as current, will it hurt anything? No, because /etc/conf.d/ and /etc/init.d are usually in CONFIG_PROTECT, so portage wouldn't touch these files anyway. --=20 Neil Bothwick You sound reasonable...Time to up my medication. --Sig_TRY1BeJb93MxJMY_.VhruMt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDukSkum4al0N1GQMRAr0QAJ9OA7OYuJ/Cuw+feAVQ8OYQDjgBWwCgqg3j gt0a8sCEw2O2WskCebJQsLY= =Rl2R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_TRY1BeJb93MxJMY_.VhruMt-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list