From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is there and Alternative to compiling kde?
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:40:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051214104051.115a5ae1@hactar.digimed.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512140307.jBE37qRJ013177@robin.gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2300 bytes --]
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:07:45 -0800, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> CPUs are fast, but the programs are still monolithic and take days to
> compile.
Why do you think the larger packages are moving to a modular structure?
This thread is about KDE, and while the monolithic packages are sytill
available, the split ebuilds are the preferred choice.
> I fully agree (and have brought this up before months and years ago) --
> I believe we should have binaries available for the big packages like
> KDE, OO, Gnome, etc.
They are. OOo has always been available as a binary (only as a binary on
some platforms) and other packages are on the GRP discs, where the
dependencies issue Richard mentioned doesn't apply, since they are tied
to a particular Stage 3 install. The compile times are only really an
issue for initial installation, where Stage 3 + GRP brings the total time
down to around an hour. Once your desktop is running, you can continue
to use it while compiling updates.
> Ya'll that like to waste your time compiling can
> keep on doing that, while the rest of us would like to get some work
> done.
There's this thing called multitasking, where you computer lets you use
it while processing other tasks in the background. It is ideally suited
to this.
> And for you all that want to say -- "switch Distros", your logic is
> flawed. Just because I don't want to waste 3 days or more compiling KDE
> on a 2Ghz/640MB notebook,
I'd take your notebook back to the shop. My 1GHz G4 iBook with similar RAM
updated KDE to 3.5 in around 12 hours, most of which was overnight.
> doesn't mean I don't want the other benefits
> of Gentoo, like "emerge -u world" and the fact that when I do need to
> install from source (like something that isn't in portage), it usually
> just compiles fine. RedHat 8 NEVER worked that way for me.
Because Red Hat uses binary packages, which raises incompatibilities. It
is easy to install non-portage packages from source because everything
else is also compiled from source.
If you really want current packages compiled on someone else's computer,
they are already available and the URI was posted to this thread last
week.
--
Neil Bothwick
In a classified ad: "Tired of cleaning yourself? Let me do it."
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-14 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-09 21:55 [gentoo-user] Is there and Alternative to compiling kde? Harry Putnam
2005-12-09 22:08 ` Jeff
2005-12-09 22:20 ` Tom Smith
2005-12-09 22:35 ` Gerhard Hoogterp
2005-12-09 22:50 ` Dale
2005-12-09 22:58 ` Tom Smith
2005-12-10 0:22 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 2:24 ` [gentoo-user] " Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 10:29 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 13:52 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 1:39 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 10:58 ` [gentoo-user] " Holly Bostick
2005-12-10 14:59 ` Gerhard Hoogterp
2005-12-10 15:44 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-09 23:02 ` Chris White
2005-12-10 0:42 ` Dale
2005-12-10 1:46 ` [gentoo-user] " Daniel da Veiga
2005-12-10 1:59 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-14 3:07 ` Daevid Vincent
2005-12-14 6:14 ` Steven Susbauer
2005-12-14 6:20 ` Richard Fish
2005-12-14 20:42 ` Christoph Eckert
2005-12-14 9:43 ` Holly Bostick
2005-12-14 10:40 ` Neil Bothwick [this message]
2005-12-10 1:37 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 1:47 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 8:17 ` Chris White
2005-12-10 13:49 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 15:49 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 16:31 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 16:49 ` Brett I. Holcomb
2005-12-10 17:09 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 17:56 ` [gentoo-user] " Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051214104051.115a5ae1@hactar.digimed.co.uk \
--to=neil@digimed.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox