From: Jeff <jmg_071769@comcast.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is there and Alternative to compiling kde?
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 17:08:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200512091708.28868.jmg_071769@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <umzjaylyl.fsf@newsguy.com>
On Friday 09 December 2005 16:55, Harry Putnam wrote:
Check out Kubuntu dude. It's probably right up your alley. This is *not* an
anti-Gentoo email. I 100% love Gentoo, and will continue to use it!
(Puts asbestos suit back in the drawer...)
> I'll probably need the asbestos drawers here shortly:
>
> I've burned up several hours here with a grindingly slow compile of
> kde. It is an older machine ( a few years) but is a P4 2Ghz and 500MB
> ram. Is there an alternative to this? I mean aside from using a
> lighter, faster compiling, X setup.
>
> I've been away from Fedora now for about a year I guess. I left
> Fedora and redhat after nearly 10yrs because the updates had gotten to
> where it was every few mnths a full reinstall. I liked gentoo because
> one can update cleanly without a full reinstall, but now I'm losing
> what seems even more time with really slow compilations
>
> Just on the face of it, it seems somewhat unreasonable with modern
> software and powerfull computers, to need to spend this amount of time
> just to get working software running.
>
> I seem to recall a kde install being a matter that consumed something
> like 1/2 hr on Fedora. Must be that those packages are already
> compiled?
>
> Is that an option for us?
>
> Is there some burning important reason why we need to throw away hours
> and hours compiling kde? Wouldn't a binary distribution of kde serve
> as well in most ways?
--
Han Solo:
Oh! I thought they smelled bad on the *outside*!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-09 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-09 21:55 [gentoo-user] Is there and Alternative to compiling kde? Harry Putnam
2005-12-09 22:08 ` Jeff [this message]
2005-12-09 22:20 ` Tom Smith
2005-12-09 22:35 ` Gerhard Hoogterp
2005-12-09 22:50 ` Dale
2005-12-09 22:58 ` Tom Smith
2005-12-10 0:22 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 2:24 ` [gentoo-user] " Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 10:29 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 13:52 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 1:39 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 10:58 ` [gentoo-user] " Holly Bostick
2005-12-10 14:59 ` Gerhard Hoogterp
2005-12-10 15:44 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-09 23:02 ` Chris White
2005-12-10 0:42 ` Dale
2005-12-10 1:46 ` [gentoo-user] " Daniel da Veiga
2005-12-10 1:59 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-14 3:07 ` Daevid Vincent
2005-12-14 6:14 ` Steven Susbauer
2005-12-14 6:20 ` Richard Fish
2005-12-14 20:42 ` Christoph Eckert
2005-12-14 9:43 ` Holly Bostick
2005-12-14 10:40 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 1:37 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 1:47 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 8:17 ` Chris White
2005-12-10 13:49 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 15:49 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 16:31 ` Harry Putnam
2005-12-10 16:49 ` Brett I. Holcomb
2005-12-10 17:09 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-12-10 17:56 ` [gentoo-user] " Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200512091708.28868.jmg_071769@comcast.net \
--to=jmg_071769@comcast.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox