From: Robert Crawford <flacycads@cox.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] best filesystem for Gentoo
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 01:34:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511270134.11166.flacycads@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43893A88.1020608@tgharold.com>
On Sat November 26 2005 11:48 pm, Thomas Harold wrote:
> Colin Copley wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > Any comment on the best filesystem to use for Gentoo running a
> > webserver, I prefer more speed and less journaling, is there a standard?
>
> Probably can't go wrong with ext2 (personally, I'd still go with ext3
> because you get faster fscks during bootup, right?). Ext2/ext3 have
> been around for a long time, there are lots of tools written to work
> with them, supported in most (all?) linux distros.
>
> I'm sure there are good arguments for using Reiser, XFS, JFS, etc, but I
> haven't gotten comfortable enough about them to make the switch away
> from ext2/ext3.
For a server, I'd stay away from reiserfs, as it does appear to have serious
fragmentation over time- this is becoming more and more apparent. Check this
thread out on Gentoo forums- I posted links to a lot of good info.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-401591-start-0.html
With ext3, you might want to set the dir_index feature when you format, as
this allows diretory B=Trees to be used, and really helps with the big
performance drawback this FS has. This might be your best bet for a
webserver- rock solid, really good speed (with the dir_index option), and
virtually no fragmentation over time.
If you deal with lots of really large files, xfs might serve your circumstance
better, as it performs much better. It really depends on what you are using
your system for, and what types of files/directories reside on each
partition. For example, reiserfs (and R4) do much better than the others with
lots of really small files. But as stated, plan on doing periodic "tarball
partition and save on another media/reformat partition/copy back all data"
procedures to defrag the reiserfs partition to maintain top performance.
There is as yet no decent "repacker" for reiserfs that I know of.
This is contrary to what most people believe about all Linux file systems, but
for reiserfs, this is becoming an accepted fact. It does get seriously
fragmented over time, though probably not as quickly as a FAT or NTFS windows
partition.
Robert Crawford (wrc1944- on the forum)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-27 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-27 4:20 [gentoo-user] best filesystem for Gentoo Colin Copley
2005-11-27 4:34 ` Dale
2005-11-27 4:48 ` Thomas Harold
2005-11-27 6:34 ` Robert Crawford [this message]
2005-11-27 12:20 ` Petteri Räty
2005-11-27 12:14 ` Alexander Skwar
2005-11-27 10:06 ` Martin Tedjawardhana
2005-11-27 12:11 ` Alexander Skwar
2005-11-27 22:04 ` kashani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200511270134.11166.flacycads@cox.net \
--to=flacycads@cox.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox