From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EeXnP-0000GL-2z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:02:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAMD1suL013978; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:01:54 GMT Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.200]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAMCvdx4004975 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:57:40 GMT Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r28so1012148nza for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 04:57:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=OXJ5wmAupZ6nUuwYDtnmDaqKzFZuyrWxEbZkWySciYH/xft0lNKK0lOXEzcFtjhjL5naEkIeCJVnu2gOxplPFifOw2FQP5K0A7V1JdgLXFfA36yeC3IlnGSPyySf1vmV5XmyA4ued52yULNKyMAh9X00aOV6QDADhDjSYtZq3qk= Received: by 10.36.108.14 with SMTP id g14mr3921565nzc; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 04:57:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from paradise.home ( [210.214.85.212]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id j7sm465845nzd.2005.11.22.04.57.38; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 04:57:39 -0800 (PST) From: Abhay Kedia To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] root password gremlin Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:28:51 +0530 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051117203328.73680.qmail@web25601.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <200511220344.40861.abhay.ilugd@gmail.com> <43824FF2.1020706@planet.nl> In-Reply-To: <43824FF2.1020706@planet.nl> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1974046.8iZX9YjkWF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511221828.59588.abhay.ilugd@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: d5901689-d356-4ca4-8626-0fba357fe0db X-Archives-Hash: a18bb1090e1bb3069ab9f5eaefe51550 --nextPart1974046.8iZX9YjkWF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 22 Nov 2005 4:23 am, Holly Bostick wrote: > Just because you have a lot of packages installed that have the "pam" USE > flag doesn't mean that much-- is the flag actually enabled for those > packages? > > If so, and your system is not having any issues, I wouldn't necessarily > become hysterical just yet. > I did a emerge -pv for all those packages and looks like all of them are=20 actually using PAM. What I am thinking now is to mask any accidental update= =20 of PAM in package.mask and hope that it doesn't get messed up=20 "just_like_that". Thanks for the help. Abhay --nextPart1974046.8iZX9YjkWF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDgxYTxrDNZ6sJF8cRAu0ZAKCAGmq8KTC/702vLl8u9welUbE+XQCfXBXv /zglUud3H9G/4L0bVTSYUz0= =sK+v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1974046.8iZX9YjkWF-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list