From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: default stage3 (was : [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:13:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511211413.14160.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8aaf1ee00511210433s6d23e8a6l6d95c9c2f2ed8b7d@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday 21 November 2005 13:33, Steve B wrote:
> WTF.. I'm getting ready to rebuild my gentoo box. I have always did a stage
> 1 install. i was under the impression that if u used a stage 3 u couldn't
> muck with your CFLAGS or what not. If I'm forced to use canned binaries I
> might as well go with FC or Debian.. I've never listened to the "Gentoo is
> dead" comments.. but now who knows.. this is just crazy.. who came up with
> this stupid idea? from the sounds of it certianly not the Gentoo Community!
>
well, it was made, because the idiots are too dumb to read and follow the
stage1 instructions.
And gentoo needs more idiots, right?
Up until now, the installation was a nice filter - but that has weakend now,
too.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-21 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-21 12:33 default stage3 (was : [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?) Steve B
2005-11-21 12:57 ` Matthias Langer
2005-11-21 13:09 ` Matthias Langer
2005-11-21 12:57 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-21 13:13 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin [this message]
2005-11-21 15:17 ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-21 18:19 ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-21 22:33 ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-21 23:36 ` Anthony Roy
2005-11-22 7:49 ` Philip Webb
2005-11-22 9:24 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-22 11:22 ` Robin
2005-11-22 14:07 ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-22 17:24 ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-22 23:19 ` William Kenworthy
2005-11-23 0:11 ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-22 23:34 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-22 0:09 ` George Garvey
2005-11-22 0:17 ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-22 0:40 ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-22 2:06 ` W.Kenworthy
2005-11-22 11:32 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-21 19:20 ` kashani
2005-11-21 20:39 ` John J. Foster
2005-11-21 20:47 ` Jason Dodson
2005-11-21 21:38 ` kashani
2005-11-21 22:10 ` Steven Susbauer
2005-11-21 22:27 ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-22 18:26 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2005-11-22 18:44 ` Nagatoro
2005-11-22 20:34 ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-22 19:52 ` Billy Holmes
2005-11-22 21:44 ` kashani
2005-11-21 20:15 ` [gentoo-user] Re: default stage3 Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-21 20:50 ` Bob Young
2005-11-21 22:01 ` Ryan Sims
2005-11-21 23:28 ` Matthias Langer
2005-11-22 9:17 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-22 17:03 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-22 18:03 ` Matthias Langer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200511211413.14160.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--to=volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox