From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ed2OH-00022o-1u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:18:41 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAI9HGH5012424; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:17:16 GMT Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk (heisenberg.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.141]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAI9BOT9018387 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:11:24 GMT Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=desiato.digimed.co.uk) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Ed2HD-0008LC-S3 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:11:23 +0000 Received: from krikkit.digimed.co.uk (krikkit.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E981406204 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:44:13 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:46:55 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem Message-ID: <20051118084655.14fb5c1a@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <5b65e1f90511180012l42d79a35pf4b7c324c1c57072@mail.gmail.com> References: <5b65e1f90511170227p11586033w933ee3d8e6e6f596@mail.gmail.com> <437C5D7F.8010704@gmail.com> <5b65e1f90511170318x4ac203d2xad5250c2314c6715@mail.gmail.com> <200511170528.32382.yeahsowhat@gmail.com> <20051117143132.664dabb5@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <5b65e1f90511180012l42d79a35pf4b7c324c1c57072@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.6; powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_fds.5RhHdZ/jw2_c9lZHsbY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.69.83.178] X-Archives-Salt: e7375b64-1281-4328-bb8a-2e70f0423289 X-Archives-Hash: 693fc4451dd88cbd6b365a3705fa5293 --Sig_fds.5RhHdZ/jw2_c9lZHsbY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:12:22 +0500, askar k wrote: > But, they say you can optimize your system when you use 1st or 2nd > stage... Is it possible optimize after using 3rd stage for installation? Yes. Set up your USE and compiler flags as you want and do emerge -e world. Some say you should run it twice, or there are scripts on the forums that will take care of the few packages that do need to be compiled twice for full optimisation. Whether it is worth the extra time of compiling twice is arguable as most packages will be recompiled in due course anyway. The only difference between doing it this way and a stage 1 is that you can use the computer while everything is compiling. --=20 Neil Bothwick There's an old proverb that says just about whatever you want it to --Sig_fds.5RhHdZ/jw2_c9lZHsbY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDfZT/um4al0N1GQMRAkMOAKC4mJgOxrH1OVuk22nQFnKWycbzsQCgzpLs WgmOLleUnlmBe/uR/eAyzrU= =ttrq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_fds.5RhHdZ/jw2_c9lZHsbY-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list