From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EcUSw-0002RL-FQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:05:14 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAGL3rkR026362; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:03:53 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAGKtSVb028036 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:55:29 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2005 20:55:26 -0000 Received: from p54925106.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO torture.dnsalias.org) [84.146.81.6] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 16 Nov 2005 21:55:26 +0100 X-Authenticated: #12715896 From: Benjamin Martin To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:55:25 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <9999810b0511160820h648eb1a5o4f62300507c2b8a9@mail.gmail.com> <200511162130.38788.outrage@gmx.net> <5bdc1c8b0511161247n60b6b720vf5e2db3e0f31af8a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0511161247n60b6b720vf5e2db3e0f31af8a@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1473781.H8SYUZxzbl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511162155.25694.outrage@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: 0f50044f-cb7a-4520-9205-4d6311e43aef X-Archives-Hash: f3f2a836da8544f7869b467c1901cc46 --nextPart1473781.H8SYUZxzbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:47, Mark Knecht wrote: > I'm not a developer and I've never done a Stage 1 install so I cannot > say for sure, but it's my understanding that after a Stage 3 install > most people end up rebuilding everything anyway within a few weeks. > Very soon my Stage 3 and your Stage 1 are identical. The Stage 1 > allows me to get the machine up and running sooner. > > Just my take on the question. > > Cheers, > Mark True that the installations become identical very soon. But what if I set u= p =20 server using stage 1 and an up-to-date portage tree. After the installation= =20 is finished it'll sit around doing whatever it's supposed to do and I don't= =20 really touch it except for security related updates. Just an example where stage 1 was a nice option. Taking away such an option= =20 doesn't sound all too much like the gentoo way to me. --nextPart1473781.H8SYUZxzbl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDe5y9/l2ZdVSV1UARApujAKCMzb1DxSkg5//r6S0qchWP5ia7vACgj+6j GTJLm5bqaJKkS0SMbJICdBQ= =RT05 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1473781.H8SYUZxzbl-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list