From: Benjamin Martin <outrage@gmx.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:55:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511162155.25694.outrage@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0511161247n60b6b720vf5e2db3e0f31af8a@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 879 bytes --]
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:47, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I'm not a developer and I've never done a Stage 1 install so I cannot
> say for sure, but it's my understanding that after a Stage 3 install
> most people end up rebuilding everything anyway within a few weeks.
> Very soon my Stage 3 and your Stage 1 are identical. The Stage 1
> allows me to get the machine up and running sooner.
>
> Just my take on the question.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
True that the installations become identical very soon. But what if I set up
server using stage 1 and an up-to-date portage tree. After the installation
is finished it'll sit around doing whatever it's supposed to do and I don't
really touch it except for security related updates.
Just an example where stage 1 was a nice option. Taking away such an option
doesn't sound all too much like the gentoo way to me.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-16 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-16 16:20 [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 18:23 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-19 15:07 ` A. Khattri
2005-11-16 19:53 ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-16 20:50 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:50 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 22:32 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 0:26 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 11:24 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 11:59 ` Nagatoro
2005-11-17 7:44 ` jarmstrong
2005-11-16 22:51 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 3:03 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17 9:23 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 13:52 ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 14:35 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 17:44 ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 15:21 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17 0:17 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-17 0:34 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 20:12 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30 ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:04 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30 ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:47 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 20:55 ` Benjamin Martin [this message]
2005-11-16 20:59 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:10 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 21:20 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 22:31 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 23:24 ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:33 ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-16 21:53 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 20:54 ` Zac Medico
2005-11-16 22:22 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:37 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 0:21 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-17 14:03 ` Bill Roberts
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-16 20:27 Budd, Tracy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200511162155.25694.outrage@gmx.net \
--to=outrage@gmx.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox