From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EcU7M-0003Fd-E3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:42:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAGKfgrR031547; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:41:42 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAGKUe5Y007692 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:30:42 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2005 20:30:39 -0000 Received: from p54925106.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO torture.dnsalias.org) [84.146.81.6] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 16 Nov 2005 21:30:39 +0100 X-Authenticated: #12715896 From: Benjamin Martin To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:30:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <9999810b0511160820h648eb1a5o4f62300507c2b8a9@mail.gmail.com> <20051117090935.27DE.NICK@rout.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <20051117090935.27DE.NICK@rout.co.nz> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5184533.G1zGjFLRnI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511162130.38788.outrage@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: 87d3f3d1-b316-467f-94ad-e181ea59e2a8 X-Archives-Hash: a70048f55ccf8e1315cef690eb0f4ab3 --nextPart5184533.G1zGjFLRnI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:12, Nick Rout wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:20:36 -0500 > > Derek Tracy wrote: > > Part way through the online handbook I noticed that > > they standardized the Stage3 install. I figured that since the develope= rs > > thought it was best to use a Stage3 install then why not give it a shot. > > I read your message and was surprised at this. Last time I read the > handbooks the Handbook gave stage 1/2/3 options and the 2005.1 handbook > stuck to stage 3. (Talking x86 here, I have never done an instal on > other architectures). > > Now, like you, I read this in the Handbook: > > "Make sure you download a stage3 tarball - installations using a stage1 or > stage2 tarball are not supported anymore." To be honest, this is the first time i see this. I always did stage 1=20 installs. Haven't done so in a while that's why I'm a little surprised abou= t=20 this. What exactly were the reasons for such a move? --nextPart5184533.G1zGjFLRnI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBDe5bu/l2ZdVSV1UARAiHnAJ4+NoH8irWFD7e3Yb17FqTB9JYiqgCXVknx gudlWs0pGq26T+KJ1y0FMw== =1hXq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5184533.G1zGjFLRnI-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list