From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EcVHA-0005iX-GU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:57:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAGLu9BU026974; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:56:09 GMT Received: from mail2.performics.com (mail2.performics.com [63.240.137.252]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAGLocI0029677 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:50:38 GMT Received: from [172.18.33.41] ([172.18.33.41]) by mail2.performics.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:55:28 -0600 From: Jeff Smelser To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:53:00 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <9999810b0511160820h648eb1a5o4f62300507c2b8a9@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0511161247n60b6b720vf5e2db3e0f31af8a@mail.gmail.com> <200511162155.25694.outrage@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200511162155.25694.outrage@gmx.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2671671.nPQhpxmY5A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511161553.02299.tradergt@gmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Nov 2005 21:55:28.0040 (UTC) FILETIME=[74AFE280:01C5EAF8] X-Archives-Salt: 0db28863-aa34-43eb-85a3-4063be4e607b X-Archives-Hash: 99bb80fdb414f4c7aedc6607609e060a --nextPart2671671.nPQhpxmY5A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:55 pm, Benjamin Martin wrote: > True that the installations become identical very soon. But what if I set > up server using stage 1 and an up-to-date portage tree. After the > installation is finished it'll sit around doing whatever it's supposed to > do and I don't really touch it except for security related updates. > Just an example where stage 1 was a nice option. Taking away such an opti= on > doesn't sound all too much like the gentoo way to me. They are not taking it away. They just dont support it, big difference.. We just went through all this not a few weeks ago, why are we going through= =20 this again? Jeff --nextPart2671671.nPQhpxmY5A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDe6o+oOk9EvUvEtgRAp0IAKCFV2lFzeUGZLr1/VEb+Z9c63N3rQCgqMKT 0bFsJohUCTC3TAZk2YVryRQ= =0jHj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2671671.nPQhpxmY5A-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list