From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EZnrm-0000lf-Fi for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:11:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA9BAKOb006273; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:10:20 GMT Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk (rutherford.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.142]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA9B47V3020949 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:04:07 GMT Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=desiato.digimed.co.uk) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EZnkN-0007KI-Dp for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:04:07 +0000 Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD691406223 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:57:44 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:57:44 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Out of portage Message-ID: <20051109085744.14409222@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4FE82EE778704E4D9D31E9CE0BEC14650D2C72@caf02.caf.local> References: <4FE82EE778704E4D9D31E9CE0BEC14650D2C72@caf02.caf.local> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.99 (GTK+ 2.8.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_jKUxtzPlFmSuKPwUWw9CA9a; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.69.83.178] X-Archives-Salt: d998bd75-64ef-48cb-9129-2324cc4a15bc X-Archives-Hash: ff9a266cfaf3a05a5930dddbd4b8b66c --Sig_jKUxtzPlFmSuKPwUWw9CA9a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:23:31 +0200, Eray Aslan wrote: > > You'll just have to keep an eye for upgrades, because they > > will probably come without this patch. If you want this patch to be > > included in postfix create a bug in bugzilla with the request. >=20 > I don't think it is a good idea. I would not second guess Wietse > (author of postfix) for the suitability of the patch for general > consumption. The patch could be made optional, enabled by a USE flag. --=20 Neil Bothwick "It compiled? The first screen came up? Ship it!" -- Bill Gates --Sig_jKUxtzPlFmSuKPwUWw9CA9a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDcboIum4al0N1GQMRAo1GAJwKdogq4DIvadsZBHmEKyQEI5NlPACdFinH 18lviRciTNJT3+7JLWYW2Jg= =zE0k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_jKUxtzPlFmSuKPwUWw9CA9a-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list