From: Nick Rout <nick@rout.co.nz>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage: fixed or not???
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:13:47 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051107111154.641A.NICK@rout.co.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <436E6FAA.1070307@gmx.net>
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:03:38 +0100
Jarry wrote:
> Nick Rout wrote:
> > To everyone in this thread: it would probably help if you specified
> > which version of portage you are running!
>
> Do you really think it is important? Because since I'm using Gentoo,
> I do not take care about versions, portage does it instead of me.
> All I do is running this set of commands every night from crontab:
Of course it bloody matters. If the portage package was changed it
results in a new version, so maybe you are not running a version with
the "fix". Or maybe you are. But how the hell would we know unless you
tell us?
> So my portage is also always updated, to the last stable version.
> Now it is 2.0.51.22-r3...
>
great, so you see the sync delay at 50% with this version or not?
> Jarry
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
--
Nick Rout <nick@rout.co.nz>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-06 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-06 15:34 [gentoo-user] portage: fixed or not??? Jarry
2005-11-06 15:52 ` Dale
2005-11-06 17:35 ` John Green
2005-11-06 16:19 ` Norberto Bensa
2005-11-06 20:39 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-06 21:03 ` Jarry
2005-11-06 22:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-06 22:13 ` Nick Rout [this message]
2005-11-06 22:27 ` b.n.
2005-11-07 18:02 ` Qian Qiao
2005-11-07 18:11 ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-07 18:36 ` Qian Qiao
2005-11-07 18:55 ` Jarry
2005-11-07 18:43 ` Jarry
2005-11-07 19:07 ` Qian Qiao
2005-11-07 19:52 ` kashani
2005-11-07 19:12 ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-07 20:04 ` Jarry
2005-11-07 20:31 ` Qian Qiao
2005-11-07 20:44 ` Qian Qiao
2005-11-07 21:09 ` Jarry
2005-11-07 21:49 ` Qian Qiao
2005-11-07 21:51 ` Qian Qiao
2005-11-07 22:57 ` A. Khattri
2005-11-07 21:10 ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-07 21:38 ` Jarry
2005-11-07 22:11 ` kashani
2005-11-07 22:26 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-07 21:27 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-07 21:52 ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-07 22:23 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-07 22:56 ` Billy Holmes
2005-11-07 20:02 ` b.n.
2005-11-07 19:06 ` Jarry
2005-11-07 20:26 ` b.n.
2005-11-07 19:49 ` Jarry
2005-11-07 20:44 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-07 21:26 ` b.n.
2005-11-07 20:57 ` Jarry
2005-11-07 21:22 ` Qian Qiao
2005-11-07 21:43 ` Mark
2005-11-07 22:37 ` John Jolet
2005-11-07 21:47 ` A. Khattri
2005-11-07 22:32 ` Qian Qiao
2005-11-07 22:48 ` b.n.
2005-11-07 21:55 ` Jarry
2005-11-07 20:38 ` kashani
2005-11-08 1:03 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-08 12:27 ` Holly Bostick
2005-11-06 22:42 ` Dale
2005-11-07 7:48 ` John Green
2005-11-07 14:27 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-06 21:32 ` Bogdan Ionita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051107111154.641A.NICK@rout.co.nz \
--to=nick@rout.co.nz \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox