From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EU9Aw-0003HC-2Q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:44:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9OKfjbO023788; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:41:45 GMT Received: from Princeton.EDU (postoffice02.Princeton.EDU [128.112.130.38]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9OKUINW021354 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:30:19 GMT Received: from smtpserver2.Princeton.EDU (smtpserver2.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.148]) by Princeton.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j9OKUGJx012325 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:30:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sep.dynalias.net (fez.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.190]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpserver2.Princeton.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j9OKU1pM026466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:30:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sep.dynalias.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1F4FC3A30F; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:29:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:29:48 -0400 From: Willie Wong To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0 Message-ID: <20051024202948.GA28218@princeton.edu> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <435D30B2.4020906@harvee.org> <20051024212005.463d5d0d@mating-tux.renatik.de> <435D3741.3060307@harvee.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <435D3741.3060307@harvee.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: 226427de-2c73-4286-a3b2-90c86ae1d97f X-Archives-Hash: 63cdc983833bf6f21d6db223aea46595 On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:34:25PM -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > Renat Golubchyk wrote: > >On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:26 -0400 "Eric S. Johansson" > >wrote: > >>The problem was /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and /etc/init.d/net.lo were the > >>same. The net.eth0 code was overwritten with the lo code. > >> > >>This happened on two machines and I'm wondering how it happened? Did > >>something go wrong in the emerge process? There's no sign of any > >>attackers. > > > >They are always the same since net.eth0 (and all other net.) > >is a symlink to net.lo. > > then that's what broke. net.lo looks like it should and my net.eth0 > looks like: > Is net.eth0 a symlink to net.lo? If not, remove net.eth0 and symlink it to net.lo. If net.eth0 is already a symlink, then something is seriously wrong, since the file you just showed us was definitely not the 2005.1 one. W -- AlexMc: Physics? Physics is EZ.. M: The Langrangian is self evident. AlexMc: Well... not that easy. Sortir en Pantoufles: up 2 days, 12:37 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list