From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ET9u6-0002xN-Pw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:18:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9M3B5wm019688; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:11:05 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9M3367e009362 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:03:06 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AAEC2D0CA5 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:05:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (hathor.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.1]) by amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B1F2D0C87 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:05:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.8) with ESMTP id 8655450 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:05:56 +0200 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] PANIC !!!! Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:05:52 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <1cc2dc830510211211w7949e57fm79a52ccf90882e37@mail.gmail.com> <200510220221.28470.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <200510212020.59545.tradergt@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200510212020.59545.tradergt@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510220505.53111.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: bd81de47-9f6d-4c67-95ca-8be7745fcb4a X-Archives-Hash: b892c25722c399d16bd97920cef0d097 On Saturday 22 October 2005 03:20, Jeff Smelser wrote: > On Friday 21 October 2005 07:21 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > which a) does not catch all the cases > > and b) would not be needed at all, if you don't do '--deep' updates. > > Your trolling, arnt you? Are you really so naive that you think not having > --deep solves all your problems? You do realize what --deep does right? > > Jeff I do. You don't. Maybe you should re-read the documentation. Than think about 'compile time dependency', 'runtime dependency' and 'Version'. I wish you good luck. Oh, and I never said, that it 'solves all problems'. I say, not doing it, is keeping you away from certain problems. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list