From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ET5kT-0000B9-G1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:52:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9LMmjx4008116; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:48:45 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9LMgq7t013387 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:42:52 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id AAD9D2D0C5E for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:45:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (hathor.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.1]) by amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0632D0C36 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:45:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.8) with ESMTP id 8654090 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:45:40 +0200 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] PANIC !!!! Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:45:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <1cc2dc830510211211w7949e57fm79a52ccf90882e37@mail.gmail.com> <200510212124.44005.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <200510211513.02228.tradergt@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200510211513.02228.tradergt@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510220045.40385.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 1bc57d57-718f-46fa-9c14-fa7709d16702 X-Archives-Hash: 60fe75014dd62240623702cf9c112535 On Friday 21 October 2005 22:13, Jeff Smelser wrote: > On Friday 21 October 2005 02:24 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > what do you mean 'crashed'? > > > > does revdep-rebuilt still works? > > > > but at least now you know why you should not use --deep. > > Why not? I use it here and I never get crashes.. One doesnt mean the other. > because some apps (like, for example xine) doesn't like it, when some of their dependencies get upgraded with a --deep world (like ffmpeg or transcode), while themselves are not recombiled. xine will not crash - but some video-filters will be gone. It is just not wise: App X linked against library L. Now you do an --update --deep world. lib L gets a new version L.1.1. But X does not recompiled, and funny things can happen now. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list