From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ESIde-00075p-QG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:26:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9JIMYUa018452; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:22:34 GMT Received: from gandalf.home.gaima.co.uk (cpc2-hudd1-6-0-cust92.hudd.cable.ntl.com [81.111.209.92]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9JIHPJX003226 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:17:25 GMT Received: (qmail 16338 invoked by uid 1114); 19 Oct 2005 19:19:51 +0100 Received: from minimac.home.gaima.co.uk (HELO minimac.home.gaima.co.uk) (192.168.22.221) by gandalf.home.gaima.co.uk (qpsmtpd/0.31-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:19:51 +0100 From: Mike Williams Organization: Mac Mini To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev Migration and SCSI Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:19:49 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: <43567972.7000205@ianbrandt.com> In-Reply-To: <43567972.7000205@ianbrandt.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510191919.49850.mike@gaima.co.uk> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j9JIHPJX003226 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j9JIMYUt018452 X-Archives-Salt: c5834893-7b32-4e7a-9af4-c1dbc47d4953 X-Archives-Hash: 5922167e36eae280c97f6322aa7a1c65 On Wednesday 19 October 2005 17:50, Ian Brandt wrote: > 1) How can I tell what the new name is going to be? I'd imagine /dev/sdXY will exist under both udev and devfs, and be the sa= me,=20 they certainly always have done for me. > 2) As I'm doing this upgrade remotely, how can I set up to fail back > to my udev-less 2.4.25 kernel should 2.6.13 still fail to come up? =A0I= n > other words, if I change fstab to be udev specific won't that leave me > dead in the water? fstab doesn't have to take block devices, it can take labels too, you cou= ld=20 look into labeling your partitions. --=20 Mike Williams --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list