From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RKizU-0006WA-97 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:56:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D3C521C045 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j92Nhaak019685 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 23:43:36 GMT Received: from mail.joat.com ([71.114.140.80]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0INR002ZKBLZ7NI3@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 18:51:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (cornholio.joat.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.joat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CACBBB25 for ; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:51:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.joat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.joat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16970-10 for ; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:51:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from butthead.joat.com (butthead.joat.com [192.168.0.10]) by mail.joat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:51:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:49:23 -0400 From: Dave Nebinger Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why would portage not update a package? In-reply-to: <43406730.6080604@gmail.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Message-id: <200510021949.28079.dnebinger@joat.com> Organization: Joat.com Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at joat.com References: <200510021839.58458.dnebinger@joat.com> <43406730.6080604@gmail.com> User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 X-Archives-Salt: 95585330-75cc-43c1-898d-019c5b5d2979 X-Archives-Hash: 2d7c1066b8085ba9de3221afbb9de6ac On Sunday 02 October 2005 07:03 pm, Zac Medico wrote: > The likely explanation is that ant-core is not a dependency (direct or > deep) of your "world" list. Ah, but if it is installed it must have been a dependency somewhere or in place as a result of a direct emerge. Eix and emerge both knew it was installed and that it needed to be updated at the point when I was going to emerge eclipse. So I don't think that answer covers it... > One way to verify is with "emerge -a > depclean". If you want to keep any of the depclean packages then you > should add some to /var/lib/portage/world. I haven't played with depclean so I'm going to have to look into that. So far I've taken the "if it's not broke, don't fix it" path in regards to the portage subsystem. Up until this incident I didn't think it was broke. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list