From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Nasty bugs in portage?
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 00:15:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050912001558.367e7e9f@hactar.digimed.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509111724.19632.john@jolet.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 686 bytes --]
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:24:19 -0500, John Jolet wrote:
> > > > IMHO, stage 3 is for those that don't want to take the lengthy
> > > > build time for some of the larger packages, i.e. X and kde/gnome,
> > > > in order to have a basic working gentoo system in a short
> > > > timeframe.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure where you get this from, since X and kde/gnome aren't
> > > IN a stage-3 tarball.
> >
> > No, but they are on the GRP package CDs that accompany each release.
> yes, but there's no requirement to use grp packages with a stage-3.
There is if you're using stage 3 as quoted above.
--
Neil Bothwick
I'm writing a book. I've got the page numbers done.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-11 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-10 18:09 [gentoo-user] Nasty bugs in portage? Frank Schafer
2005-09-10 18:37 ` Dave Nebinger
1987-12-31 23:18 ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-10 19:26 ` John Jolet
2005-09-10 19:33 ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-10 21:08 ` Zac Medico
2005-09-10 19:39 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-10 19:49 ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-10 20:09 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-10 20:13 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-10 19:42 ` Justin Patrin
2005-09-10 19:47 ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-10 21:03 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2005-09-11 6:33 ` Nick Rout
2005-09-11 9:04 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-11 16:38 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2005-09-11 16:58 ` Mark Shields
2005-09-11 17:12 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2005-09-11 17:49 ` Zac Medico
2005-09-11 18:12 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-11 18:18 ` Zac Medico
2005-09-11 18:30 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-11 19:51 ` Zac Medico
2005-09-11 21:56 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-11 19:15 ` John Jolet
2005-09-11 19:27 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-11 21:57 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-11 22:24 ` John Jolet
2005-09-11 23:15 ` Neil Bothwick [this message]
2005-09-11 23:49 ` Nick Rout
2005-09-12 7:27 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-13 20:42 ` Andrew MacKenzie
2005-09-12 0:59 ` John Jolet
2005-09-12 7:31 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-11 23:39 ` Nick Rout
2005-09-12 7:00 ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-12 16:32 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2005-09-11 17:45 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-11 19:16 ` Holly Bostick
2005-09-11 22:01 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-12 7:11 ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-12 7:33 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-12 7:52 ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-12 22:31 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-13 10:53 ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-11 23:51 ` Nick Rout
2005-09-12 6:56 ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-12 9:12 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2005-09-12 9:20 ` Frank Schafer
2005-09-12 17:53 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2005-09-14 1:45 ` Nick Rout
2005-09-14 2:21 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2005-09-12 6:39 ` [gentoo-user] [WORKAROUNDED]Nasty " Frank Schafer
2005-09-11 15:05 ` [gentoo-user] Nasty " Hans-Werner Hilse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050912001558.367e7e9f@hactar.digimed.co.uk \
--to=neil@digimed.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox