From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EDwED-0004po-5f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 03:40:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8A3Z7av015273; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 03:35:07 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8A3U1hl021463 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 03:30:01 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FB922A9E4A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:33:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (hathor.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.1]) by amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2222A9E40 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:33:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 7636792 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:33:56 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer and/or X optimization Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:33:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050907010804.GA26857@waltdnes.org> <200509080613.27315.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <20050910022726.GA20892@waltdnes.org> In-Reply-To: <20050910022726.GA20892@waltdnes.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509100533.57582.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 9d1ba281-9c34-44b1-90f1-cf7d3540cd71 X-Archives-Hash: 80ec60695622c2147e55c33880e1b7b3 On Saturday 10 September 2005 04:27, Walter Dnes wrote: Radeon X300 is PCI-Express, so the slots are > probably different. > > Strange, but true. I can get the Radeon 7000 into my 6-year-old Dell's > AGP slot, but I can't get the old Rage Pro into the newer dead machine's > AGP slot, not that it matters. Oh well, at least my 6-year-old Dell > emergency backup has now been upgraded from an 8 megabyte RagePro to a > 32 megabyte Radeon 7000. that is because of the different AGP standards (1,2,3.0) which have different voltages (3v,1,5v,0,8v) and different 'identifaction' keys, which prevent inserting a card into a slot, that could damage her with overvoltages and vice versa. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list