From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECoaA-0001t3-BG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:18:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j871CSYJ027346; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 01:12:28 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8714XDm032297 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 01:04:33 GMT Received: from smtp.istop.com ([66.11.167.126]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECoPt-0004fu-SK for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:07:58 +0000 Received: from waltdnes.org (i216-58-10-213.cybersurf.com [216.58.10.213]) by smtp.istop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2487C2B3C9 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 21:08:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 21:08:04 -0400 From: waltdnes@waltdnes.org Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 21:08:04 -0400 To: Gentoo Users List Subject: [gentoo-user] mplayer and/or X optimization Message-ID: <20050907010804.GA26857@waltdnes.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: a27b34e3-3626-434b-88ae-10a637987e55 X-Archives-Hash: 3d4084c11fec1f129e545fed25f57514 I'm running an AMD64 3000+ with 2 gigs of ram and an ATI Radeon X300. It's dropping frames on internet TV sites where it should easily be able to keep up. I've built mplayer with mmx/mmxext/3dnow/3dnowext/sse/sse2 so I don't see any room for speedup there. I can get "-vo sdl" and "-vo xv" to work, but not "-vo radeon_vid". As a matter of fact, I can't find any vidix modules at all. They're simply not being built. Here's the output of "emerge -pv mplayer". [ebuild R ] media-video/mplayer-1.0_pre7-r1 -3dfx +3dnow +3dnowext +X +aac -aalib +alsa (-altivec) -arts -bidi -bl -cdparanoia -cpudetection +custom-cflags -debug +dga -directfb +divx4linux -doc -dts -dv -dvb +dvd +dvdread -edl +encode -esd -fbcon -ggi +gif -gtk +i8x0 -ipv6 -jack -joystick +jpeg -libcaca -lirc -live -lzo -mad -matroska -matrox +mmx +mmxext -mythtv -nas -nls -nvidia +opengl -oss +png +real -rtc -samba +sdl +sse +sse2 -svga -tga +theora +truetype -v4l -v4l2 +vorbis +win32codecs -xanim -xinerama -xmms +xv -xvid -xvmc 7,397 kB For some reason the video card shows up twice in hardware detection. Does this have any affect on X Window speed? Here's output from "cat /proc/pci"... VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370 5B60 [Radeon X300 (PCIE)] (rev 0). IRQ 5. Prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe0000000 [0xe7ffffff]. I/O at 0x9000 [0x90ff]. Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe9000000 [0xe900ffff]. Bus 5, device 0, function 1: Display controller: PCI device 1002:5b70 (ATI Technologies Inc) (rev 0). Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe9010000 [0xe901ffff]. and here's what "lspci -v" shows... 0000:05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370 5B60 [Radeon X300 (PCIE)] (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 1b60 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 5 Memory at e0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] I/O ports at 9000 [size=256] Memory at e9000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [58] #10 [0001] Capabilities: [80] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable- 0000:05:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370 [Radeon X300SE] Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 1b61 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Memory at e9010000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [58] #10 [0001] -- Walter Dnes My musings on technology and security at http://tech_sec.blog.ca -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list